Telangana High Court Directs Petitioner to Secure Legal Counsel for English Proceedings
The Telangana High Court has granted a four-week adjournment to a social worker from Khammam, allowing him time to appoint a lawyer and present his public interest litigation (PIL) case in English. This decision came during a hearing on Wednesday before a bench comprising Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice GM Mohiuddin.
Background of the Public Interest Litigation
The PIL was originally filed in 2020 by Tummalapalli Rambabu, a resident of Sitharampuram in Khammam district. In his petition, Rambabu alleged that higher authorities failed to take action against officials from the panchayat raj and roads and buildings departments. He contended that these officials awarded more than 22 contracts to a single firm, MSR Constructions, in clear violation of established norms and regulations.
Rambabu further argued that despite obtaining crucial documents through the Right to Information Act, no effective inquiry was initiated into these alleged irregularities. The case highlights concerns over transparency and accountability in government contract allocations within the state.
Court Proceedings and Language Requirement
When the matter was brought before the bench, Rambabu, who is representing himself, addressed the court in Telugu. He requested permission to argue his case in his native language, asserting that he could present the facts more clearly and effectively in Telugu.
However, the bench firmly observed that since all affidavits and pleadings in the case were filed in English, the court proceedings must be conducted in the same language. Justice GM Mohiuddin specifically noted that if arguments were presented in Telugu, Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh would not be able to follow the submissions, potentially hindering the judicial process.
Court's Advice and Petitioner's Response
The court advised Rambabu to engage an advocate to represent him in the proceedings. The bench also mentioned that legal assistance could be arranged through the legal services authority if required, ensuring access to justice for the petitioner.
In response, Rambabu sought one month's time to appoint legal counsel. Accepting this request, the bench adjourned the matter for four weeks. This period is intended to enable Rambabu to secure proper legal representation and effectively pursue his case regarding the alleged contract violations.
Implications and Next Steps
This development underscores the procedural requirements in high court proceedings, particularly the necessity of conducting arguments in the language of the filed documents. It also reflects the court's commitment to ensuring fair hearings by facilitating legal aid when needed.
The adjournment provides Rambabu with an opportunity to strengthen his case with professional legal support. The next hearing in four weeks will focus on the substantive allegations of contract irregularities and the actions of the concerned officials.
