Telangana HC Seeks Police Input on iBomma Ravi's Bail in Major Piracy Case
Telangana HC on iBomma Ravi's Bail in Piracy Racket

Telangana High Court Seeks Police Input on iBomma Ravi's Bail in Major Piracy Case

In a significant development, the Telangana High Court in Hyderabad has directed the police to obtain and present instructions regarding the bail petitions filed by Emandi Ravi, widely known as iBomma Ravi. Ravi is identified as the mastermind and sole accused in a high-profile movie piracy racket that has severely impacted the Tollywood film industry.

Court Hearing Details and Passport Controversy

Justice K Sujana presided over the hearing on Friday, where bail petitions filed by Ravi in five separate cases were reviewed. During the proceedings, the court issued a directive to Ravi's counsel, instructing them to produce Ravi's Irish passport if he wishes to be considered for bail. However, Ravi's legal representative, Muzaffar Ali Khan, promptly informed the court that no such passport exists, adding a layer of complexity to the case.

Arguments from Both Sides

Ravi's defense team argued for bail on the grounds that the police have already concluded their investigation and conducted extensive custodial interrogation. They emphasized that further detention is unnecessary, given the completion of these procedural steps.

In opposition, public prosecutor Palle Nageshwar Rao vehemently contested the bail petitions. Rao contended that Ravi orchestrated a massive and sophisticated piracy racket, resulting in financial losses estimated at thousands of crores for the film industry. Highlighting the severity of the alleged crimes, Rao argued, "If granted bail, there is every possibility of him fleeing the country," underscoring concerns about flight risk and the need for continued custody.

Adjournment and Future Proceedings

After carefully recording the submissions from both sides, Justice Sujana adjourned the matter for further hearing. The court's decision to seek police instructions indicates a thorough approach to evaluating the bail petitions, balancing legal rights with the gravity of the accusations. This case continues to draw significant attention due to its implications for intellectual property rights and the economic health of the regional film industry.