Andrew Tate Makes Startling Claim About Charlie Kirk's Assassination
In a recent podcast interview that has sent shockwaves through political and media circles, controversial influencer Andrew Tate made a startling declaration regarding the killing of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. During his conversation with host Jack Neel, Tate stated with deliberate gravity, "I know who killed him" when discussing Kirk's death, though he notably refrained from naming any specific individual or presenting concrete evidence to support his claim.
The Tragic Shooting at Utah Valley University
The backdrop to these explosive comments is the tragic incident that unfolded on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Charlie Kirk was fatally shot while delivering a speech on campus. According to official reports from law enforcement authorities, a gunman positioned on a nearby rooftop opened fire. Kirk sustained critical injuries and was transported to a local hospital, where he was later pronounced dead.
Police swiftly apprehended 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson in connection with the shooting. Robinson now faces serious criminal charges, including aggravated murder and other offenses related to the violent attack. The arrest brought some measure of closure to the immediate investigation, but it has not quelled all questions surrounding the circumstances of Kirk's death.
Tate's Cautious Revelations and Owens' Public Theories
During the podcast, Andrew Tate exhibited visible caution, pausing significantly before making his provocative statement. He explained his hesitation by saying, "Sorry for the pause. I'm just scanning what's going to keep me alive." This remark underscored the perceived sensitivity and potential danger associated with discussing the Kirk case publicly.
Tate specifically pointed to conservative commentator Candace Owens as the only person "overtly giving theories as to who killed him publicly." He suggested that Owens' public questioning of the official narrative is being tolerated by those in power because she is often dismissed or not taken seriously by mainstream media and the public. Tate argued that if a more conventionally authoritative figure, such as "a man in a suit," voiced similar theories, they would face immediate silencing or serious repercussions.
Candace Owens' Controversial Assertions
Candace Owens has indeed been vocal in her skepticism about the official account of Charlie Kirk's killing. She has publicly stated that she does not believe Tyler Robinson acted alone. In a particularly bold assertion, Owens declared, "I now can say with full confidence that I believe Charlie Kirk was betrayed by the leadership of Turning Point USA and some of the very people who eulogized him on stage."
Her comments have ignited significant controversy and drawn intense scrutiny, raising questions about potential conspiracies or undisclosed motives behind the assassination. Owens' willingness to challenge the established narrative has positioned her at the center of the ongoing debate and speculation surrounding Kirk's death.
Unanswered Questions and Ongoing Speculation
The combination of Andrew Tate's cryptic claim of insider knowledge and Candace Owens' public theorizing has fueled widespread speculation and debate. While Tate stopped short of providing names or evidence, his implication that powerful forces are involved has added a layer of intrigue to an already tragic and high-profile case.
The shooting at Utah Valley University remains a deeply somber event, and the official legal process against the accused gunman, Tyler James Robinson, continues. However, the comments from figures like Tate and Owens ensure that public discussion and scrutiny of the case will persist, with many calling for greater transparency and a thorough examination of all possible angles in this shocking act of violence.
