BJP MP Karan Bhushan Distances Himself from UGC Equity Regulations Amid Public Backlash
BJP MP Karan Bhushan Distances from UGC Equity Rules

BJP MP Karan Bhushan Denies Role in UGC Equity Regulations Amid Growing Public Anger

In Lucknow, amidst escalating public discontent, BJP's Kaiserganj MP Karan Bhushan has made a significant statement regarding the controversial UGC equity regulations. On Wednesday, Bhushan, who served on the parliamentary standing committee that approved these regulations, asserted that the panel "had no role whatsoever" in their formulation. This declaration comes as a response to mounting criticism and is widely perceived as a strategic damage-control maneuver.

Calibrated Damage-Control Move Amid Controversy

Bhushan's assertion is being interpreted as a carefully calculated effort to distance himself, and by extension the BJP, from the intensifying controversy surrounding the new UGC rules. The MP's statement appears designed to mitigate political fallout as public anger continues to grow over the equity regulations that have sparked widespread debate across educational institutions.

Son of BJP Strongman Urges UGC Reconsideration

In a detailed social media post, Bhushan, who is the son of prominent BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, explicitly called upon the University Grants Commission to reconsider the regulations. He emphasized that the commission should demonstrate respect for public sentiments and implement necessary amendments to prevent the escalation of caste-based animosity within educational settings.

"My sentiments are with the people of our society," Bhushan stated unequivocally. He further stressed that educational institutions must never be permitted to transform into centers of caste conflict, advocating instead for inclusive progress that brings all sections of society together. "We want to move forward together, inclusively," he affirmed, highlighting his commitment to social harmony.

MP Accuses Media of Spreading Misconceptions

Adding another layer to the controversy, Bhushan accused certain media sections of disseminating misconceptions about his position and involvement. "It is extremely unfortunate that such a campaign is being waged without hearing my side of the story," he lamented, suggesting that media narratives have contributed to the misunderstanding surrounding his role in the parliamentary committee's proceedings.

This development underscores the complex interplay between political accountability, educational policy, and public sentiment in contemporary Indian governance. As the debate over UGC's equity regulations continues to unfold, Bhushan's statements reflect the broader challenges facing policymakers in balancing regulatory frameworks with social cohesion objectives.