Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan has launched a sharp critique against the Punjab government for its recent legislative move. The minister strongly condemned the state's decision to pass a resolution opposing the central VB-G RAM G Act.
Chouhan's Firm Stance on Constitutional Duty
In his remarks, made on 30 December 2025, Chouhan left no room for ambiguity. He reiterated a fundamental principle of Indian federalism: it is the Constitutional duty of both the Centre and the states to follow laws passed by Parliament. His statement underscores the ongoing tension between the state government, led by a different political party, and the central administration over the implementation of this specific act.
The Core of the Controversy
The flashpoint is the VB-G RAM G Act, a legislation enacted by the Parliament of India. The Punjab Assembly's resolution against this act represents a direct challenge to its authority. Chouhan's criticism, emanating from Bhopal, highlights the BJP-led central government's position that such state resolutions undermine the sanctity of parliamentary sovereignty and the unified legal framework of the country.
Implications and Political Repercussions
This confrontation is more than a legal debate; it carries significant political weight. The public disagreement between a Union Minister and a state government sets the stage for a potential constitutional and political standoff. Key implications include:
- Federal Relations: The incident tests the boundaries of India's federal structure and the interpretation of states' rights versus central authority.
- Political Narrative: It fuels the political discourse between the national ruling party and its opponents in Punjab.
- Implementation Challenge: It raises questions about the practical enforcement of the VB-G RAM G Act in Punjab if the state government remains opposed.
By framing the issue as one of constitutional duty, Chouhan has elevated the debate beyond partisan politics, anchoring it in the foundational legal responsibilities of all governments in India. The development marks a critical moment in the ongoing dialogue about the balance of power between New Delhi and the states.
