Kerala HC Seeks EC Response on Postal Ballot Denial for Election Duty Staff
HC Seeks EC Response on Postal Ballot Denial for Poll Staff

Kerala High Court Seeks Election Commission's Response on Postal Ballot Issue for Poll Duty Staff

The Kerala High Court has sought instructions from the Election Commission of India (EC) regarding a petition filed by government employees assigned to election duty. The petitioners allege they were not issued postal ballot papers, thereby depriving them of their fundamental right to vote in the ongoing electoral process.

Petition Details and Judicial Proceedings

A bench presided over by Justice Harisankar V Menon heard the petition on Friday and adjourned the matter to April 21, 2024, after directing the EC to provide its stance. The petition was filed by Muhammed Sinan V P from Vadakara and other eligible voters from the Kuttiady assembly constituency.

The core grievance revolves around the petitioners being assigned official duties at polling stations outside their home constituencies. Despite their eligibility, they claim postal ballot papers were not made available to them through the designated election facilitation centers. This logistical failure has effectively barred them from participating in the democratic exercise.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Background of Administrative Directives and Previous Court Orders

The Chief Election Commissioner had previously issued Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and subsequent instructions to ensure the timely distribution of postal ballots. These procedures mandated that facilitation centers distribute the ballots between April 1 and April 8, 2024.

Furthermore, in a related development, the Kerala High Court had earlier intervened in a separate petition filed by the Kerala NGO Union. The court had directed the Election Commission to guarantee the availability of postal ballots for all voters on election duty. Following this judicial order, additional administrative directions were issued to facilitate voting before 5 PM on April 8.

Allegations of Systemic Failure

Despite these clear directives from both the Election Commission and the judiciary, the petitioners contend that the implementation on the ground was severely lacking. They allege that several facilitation centers failed to provide the ballot papers as mandated.

This indicates a significant administrative and logistical breakdown, rendering the earlier orders ineffective for many eligible officials. The petitioners argue that this constitutes a complete failure of the system, denying them their constitutional right to vote.

Relief Sought by the Petitioners

In light of these alleged failures, the petitioners have made several key demands to the court:

  1. An immediate inquiry into the administrative and logistical lapses that led to the non-issuance of postal ballot papers.
  2. Fixation of responsibility on the officials accountable for these failures.
  3. A directive to the Election Commission to develop and implement a robust, foolproof mechanism. This system must ensure that officers on election duty are never again deprived of their voting rights due to procedural or logistical shortcomings in future elections.

The case highlights critical issues in election administration and the safeguarding of voting rights for those tasked with conducting the polls. The High Court's forthcoming hearing on April 21 is now keenly awaited for the Election Commission's official response and potential remedial measures.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration