In a strong rebuttal to recent allegations, Union Minister of State for Railways and Pune MP Murlidhar Mohol has categorically denied any involvement in the purchase of property belonging to the Jain community in Pune. The minister's statement comes as a direct response to accusations made by former MP Raju Shetti.
"I have no connection whatsoever with this property transaction," declared Mohol during a press interaction, addressing the controversy head-on. "These allegations are completely baseless and appear to be politically motivated."
The Core Controversy
The dispute centers around allegations that Mohol was involved in the acquisition of a Jain trust's property in Pune. Raju Shetti, the Swabhimani Paksha leader and former Lok Sabha member, had publicly claimed that the Union Minister played a role in the property purchase, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.
Minister's Strong Denial
Mohol didn't mince words in his response, stating emphatically: "Let Raju Shetti provide any evidence he claims to have. I challenge him to present concrete proof supporting his allegations." The minister expressed confidence that no such evidence exists, characterizing the claims as fabrications designed to tarnish his reputation.
Political Context and Timing
The timing of these allegations is particularly significant, coming amid ongoing political developments in Maharashtra. Mohol suggested that the accusations might be part of a larger political strategy to undermine his position and credibility.
"When someone cannot compete politically, they resort to such tactics," Mohol remarked, implying that the allegations were strategically timed for maximum political impact.
Call for Evidence
Rather than avoiding the controversy, Mohol has taken an assertive stance by directly challenging his accuser. "I am ready to face any investigation," he asserted, demonstrating his willingness to undergo scrutiny regarding the property matter.
The minister's firm denial and call for evidence represent a significant escalation in the ongoing political discourse, setting the stage for potential further developments in this controversy.
