AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi launched a pointed critique against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday, questioning its conspicuous silence regarding recent remarks made by former United States President Donald Trump. The Hyderabad MP accused the ruling party of selective outrage, highlighting a pattern where it vigorously pursues domestic political narratives but turns mute on international comments perceived as undermining India's dignity.
Owaisi's Sharp Critique in Maharashtra Rally
Addressing a gathering of supporters in Atur, Maharashtra, Owaisi delivered a speech that directly targeted the BJP's political strategy. He pointed out that the party and its associates are often vocal on issues such as Hindu-Muslim dynamics, love jihad, and the presence of alleged Bangladeshi immigrants. However, he contrasted this with their reluctance to comment on the statement from the former US leader. Owaisi emphasized that the Prime Minister of India represents all 133 crore citizens, and thus, the nation's self-respect should be prioritized over seeking individual praise or avoiding criticism from foreign figures.
Contrasting Priorities: International Remarks vs. Domestic Crises
Expanding his attack, the AIMIM leader accused the BJP government of ignoring pressing domestic issues while maintaining silence on the international front. He listed serious concerns plaguing the country, including the ongoing distress in the agricultural sector leading to farmers' deaths and the escalating problem of unemployment among the youth. Owaisi's remarks sought to paint a picture of a government distracted from its core duties towards its citizens. His commentary, made on January 6, 2026, adds to the ongoing political discourse surrounding India's foreign policy stance and domestic governance.
The Underlying Political Message
The core of Owaisi's argument rests on the principle of consistent national pride. By questioning why the BJP, known for its strong nationalist posture, did not respond to Trump's comments, he aimed to highlight a potential contradiction. The speech implicitly called for a foreign policy approach where India's dignity is asserted uniformly, regardless of the source of any disparaging remarks. This incident underscores the continued political scrutiny surrounding Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international engagements and the domestic opposition's strategy of holding the government accountable on both internal and external fronts.
Owaisi's public challenge in Maharashtra puts the spotlight back on the BJP's communication strategy regarding diplomatic matters. It raises questions about the balance between maintaining strategic international relationships and upholding national prestige in the public domain, a theme likely to resonate in India's charged political landscape.
