Jairam Ramesh urges Rajnath Singh to reconsider INS Baaz expansion over new airport
Ramesh urges Rajnath on INS Baaz expansion alternative

Jairam Ramesh urges Defence Minister to reconsider INS Baaz expansion over new Great Nicobar airport

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has written to Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, urging him to reconsider the government's decision against expanding the INS Baaz runway. Ramesh argues that upgrading the existing naval air station would be less ecologically destructive than building a new airport in Great Nicobar.

In a letter sent on Friday, Ramesh reminded Singh that he first proposed the INS Baaz expansion alternative on May 16. He suggested it as a way to protect the environment while still meeting strategic military objectives in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

However, on June 8, anonymous defence ministry sources told the media that expanding the runway beyond 4,500 feet would itself cause ecological damage. Ramesh said he found this concern ironic given the scale of destruction planned for the proposed greenfield airport site.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Environmental red flags

Ramesh laid out seven reasons why the proposed airport location at Gandhi Nagar-Shastri Nagar is worse than upgrading the existing naval air station.

  • The new site would require leveling two forest-covered hills that rise 115 metres each.
  • It would consume 225 acres of protected forest and another 130 acres of deemed forest-land belonging to the Shompen tribal community, which they still use.
  • Around 142 acres of the proposed site fall under ICRZ-1A, the highest protected category under coastal zone rules. That area includes turtle nesting beaches, coral reefs, and nesting grounds of the endangered Nicobar Megapode.
  • The project would also require filling a creek and relocating saltwater crocodiles.
  • Two villages housing 234 ex-servicemen families sit directly on the proposed site, and those families would be uprooted for the third time in recent years.

Ramesh described the area as largely undisturbed, pristine forest bordering an ecologically sensitive coastline. He said no serious or systematic environmental impact assessment has been done for the site.

This matters, he argued, because Great Nicobar is designated as both an Important Bird Area and an Endemic Bird Area. It also falls under two major international bird flyways, the Central Asian and the East Asian-Australasian routes, that bring migratory species to the island every year.

'Compelled to speak' after six years

The Congress leader noted that the Galathea Bay airport site was first announced as a dual-purpose facility by the Home Ministry on March 30, 2022. It took the Defence Ministry more than six years to comment on it, and even that was through anonymous briefings.

The disastrous ecological impacts of the Great Nicobar Island Project have become all-too-evident and are inviting widespread concern, Ramesh wrote. He said this public pressure has forced the ministry to finally address the issue.

He copied the letter to Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav, reminding him that he has written at least four times over the past two years about what he calls the demonstrably dubious environmental impact assessment of the entire project.

Jairam Ramesh's letter follows recent Defence Ministry statements defending the Great Nicobar project as strategically vital for India's maritime interests. Ministry sources dismissed critics as suffering from geographical illiteracy and said INS Baaz's runway would not be part of the new project.

The government plans to build an international container transshipment port, a civilian-cum-naval airport, a township, and a power plant on the island. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has alleged the project is actually meant to benefit one businessman who wants to build hotels and casinos on ecologically sensitive land.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration