Uttar Pradesh MLA Calls for State Legislation to Combat AI Misuse and Deepfake Threats
In a significant development in the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly, Samajwadi Party MLA Atul Pradhan, representing the Sardhana constituency, has voiced serious concerns over the potential misuse of artificial intelligence (AI). He specifically highlighted the dangers posed by deepfake video calls and voice copying technologies, urging the state government to enact a dedicated law to prevent such abuses.
Rising Concerns Over AI and Social Harmony
Pradhan raised this critical issue under Rule 300, emphasizing that unchecked AI misuse could evolve into a major nuisance and pose severe dangers in the near future. He warned that such activities might lead to disturbances in social harmony, as any malicious use could trigger strong, unintended reactions from individuals who are unaware of the manipulation. This, he argued, has the potential to disrupt the very fabric of society, making it imperative for authorities to take proactive measures.
State Government's Response and Jurisdictional Limitations
In response, Information and Technology Minister Sunil Sharma acknowledged the gravity of the issue but pointed out its broader scope. He stated that since AI misuse is a phenomenon with both national and international dimensions, the state government lacks the authority to formulate specific rules independently. Sharma referenced a government order issued by the Union government on February 10, which already provides for stringent punishments and heavy fines to address such concerns, suggesting that this federal directive should suffice.
Assembly Speaker and Ministerial Reactions
Assembly Speaker Satish Mahana weighed in on the discussion, urging the state government to ensure strict implementation of the Union government's order. He noted that the issue affects everyone, particularly those active in social life, and has even requested Parliamentary Affairs Minister Suresh Khanna to examine the matter more closely.
However, Minister Suresh Khanna adopted a cautious stance, indicating that he is not in a position to comment further at this time. He explained that unless and until the government seeks and receives legal opinion on the issue, no definitive statements can be made. Khanna assured the assembly that any additional steps or clarifications would be communicated once such legal advice is obtained, highlighting the need for thorough deliberation before taking action.
This exchange underscores the growing challenges posed by advancing technologies and the complex interplay between state and federal jurisdictions in regulating them effectively.
