UPSC Rank 301 Sparks Unprecedented Controversy Between Two Claimants
The announcement of Civil Services Examination results typically brings joyous celebrations for successful candidates and their families. However, one particular rank in the prestigious list has unexpectedly transformed into a major controversy that has captured national attention.
Two Akanksha Singhs, One Rank 301
According to reports, two women sharing the identical name Akanksha Singh from different Indian states are both claiming the same rank in the examination conducted by the Union Public Service Commission. The dispute specifically centers on rank number 301, creating an unusual situation in the history of India's most competitive examination.
The Bihar Claimant: Granddaughter of Ranvir Sena Founder
One of the claimants is Akanksha Singh from Ara in Bihar. She has identified herself as the granddaughter of Brahmeshwar Singh, the founder of the banned militia organization Ranvir Sena. The candidate stated that she secured the 301st rank in the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2025 during her second attempt at the prestigious test.
"I was confident about securing the result this time around. This was my grandfather's dream. He had a lot of belief in me," she revealed in statements to media. Brahmeshwar Singh was murdered back in 2012, adding a personal dimension to her achievement claim.
Discussing her preparation journey, she emphasized following a disciplined routine while studying for the demanding examination. "I used to study 8-10 hours a day. My parents played a great role in my success. Last year, when I failed to clear the exam, they kept supporting me without any frustration or anger," she explained, highlighting the family support behind her claimed achievement.
The Uttar Pradesh Claimant: Allegations of Identity Impersonation
Meanwhile, another candidate with the exact same name from Ghazipur in Uttar Pradesh has simultaneously claimed that rank 301 rightfully belongs to her. This second Akanksha Singh has taken to social media to allege that her identity is being deliberately misused by others.
"It has come to light that my rank and identity are being impersonated by others," she wrote on Facebook while sharing documents that she identified as her original identification and e-summon. Her public allegations have significantly intensified the ongoing controversy surrounding the disputed rank.
Social Media Admit Card Deepens Confusion
The controversy reached new levels of complexity when an admit card began circulating on various social media platforms. This document appeared to show identical name and roll number details, further confusing observers trying to understand the genuine claimant.
However, investigators have noted one crucial distinguishing factor. While the names and roll numbers appear remarkably similar across documents, the fathers' names mentioned in the respective documents show clear differences, suggesting either administrative error or deliberate misrepresentation.
Awaiting Official UPSC Clarification
With these conflicting claims emerging from different geographical regions, national attention has now firmly turned toward the Union Public Service Commission for an official clarification. The examination conducting body faces mounting pressure to investigate and resolve this unprecedented situation.
Until the commission issues its formal response and verification, this unusual circumstance involving two candidates with identical names claiming the same competitive rank continues to generate significant discussion and speculation across digital platforms and media outlets nationwide.
