BJP Accuses Himachal Govt of Protecting Illegal Tree Felling in Sirmaur
BJP Alleges Govt Protection in Illegal Felling of 300+ Pine Trees

BJP Leader Accuses Himachal Government of Protecting Illegal Tree Felling Offenders

In a significant environmental and political development, BJP state president Dr Rajeev Bindal on Monday raised serious concerns over the illegal felling of more than 300 pine trees in the Shillai assembly constituency of Sirmaur district. The BJP leader has directly accused the state government of actively protecting the offenders involved in this large-scale environmental violation.

Details of the Illegal Tree Felling Incident

According to Dr Bindal, the trees were cut down in broad daylight using a saw on March 5. Despite this brazen act occurring in full public view, the administration allegedly delayed taking any meaningful action, which the BJP leader interprets as clear evidence of political protection for those responsible. The incident has sparked outrage among environmental activists and political observers alike.

"The trees were cut in broad daylight using a saw, yet the administration delayed action, indicating political protection," stated Dr Bindal during his press conference. He emphasized that despite photos and videos of the illegal activity surfacing on social media platforms almost immediately, no concrete action was taken by authorities in the crucial first hours after the incident was reported.

Admission of Guilt and Registration of FIR

The following day, on March 6, some individuals publicly admitted to cutting the trees, though they claimed they had permission for only 25 trees, with the rest allegedly still in the process of obtaining proper authorization. This admission came before any official action had been taken against them.

Later that same day, an FIR was finally registered, citing the felling of 307 trees. However, Dr Bindal claims that even this official count remains incomplete, suggesting the actual number of trees illegally cut might be higher than currently documented. The delay in registering the FIR has raised questions about the administration's commitment to addressing environmental crimes promptly.

Proximity to Government Offices and Alleged Inaction

One of the most concerning aspects highlighted by the BJP leader is the proximity of the illegal felling site to key government offices. The location is just 500 metres away from the SDM office, police station, and forest range office. This close distance makes the alleged inaction by officials even more questionable.

"How could such a large-scale illegal activity occur so close to multiple government offices without immediate intervention?" questioned Dr Bindal during his statement. He criticized officials for their apparent failure to respond despite the site being within easy monitoring distance of multiple administrative and law enforcement bodies.

Suspension of Junior Staff and Protection of Higher Officials

Dr Bindal further alleged that only two junior staff members were suspended hastily in what he described as an attempt to suppress the issue and create an appearance of action. Meanwhile, higher officials who either granted permissions or delayed taking action against the illegal felling have not been held accountable according to the BJP leader.

This selective accountability, according to Dr Bindal, points to a deeper problem within the administration's handling of environmental violations. He suggested that without addressing the responsibility of senior officials, such incidents are likely to continue occurring with impunity.

Political Implications and Warning of Protests

The BJP leader issued a stern warning that if strict and comprehensive action is not taken against all those responsible—including higher officials who may have facilitated or ignored the illegal activity—the party would organize protests across the state. This environmental issue has now become a significant political flashpoint in Himachal Pradesh.

The illegal felling of over 300 pine trees represents not just an environmental crime but also a test of governance and accountability in the state. As the controversy unfolds, all eyes are on how the administration responds to these serious allegations and whether meaningful action will be taken against all parties involved in this significant environmental violation.