BJP Stages Silent Protest Against Karnataka Hate Speech Bill in Bengaluru
BJP Protests Karnataka Hate Speech Bill, Calls It Unconstitutional

The opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Karnataka took to the streets of Bengaluru on Tuesday, staging a silent demonstration to voice its strong opposition to a recently passed state legislation. The protest was directed against the Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill, which the party claims is unconstitutional and poses a severe threat to fundamental rights.

Silent Protest and Memorandum Submission

Party members gathered in front of the Deputy Commissioner's office in a show of silent dissent. A delegation from the BJP formally submitted a memorandum addressed to the state's Governor and the Chief Minister through the Deputy Commissioner's office. In this document, the party laid out its core legal and democratic objections to the proposed law, demanding that it not be implemented.

Core Objections: Free Speech and Government Overreach

The heart of the BJP's argument centers on the perceived assault on constitutional freedoms. The memorandum asserts that the bill infringes upon fundamental rights, specifically targeting the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.

The party expressed deep concern that the legislation's vague definitions could lead to a dangerous misuse of power. It argued that legitimate public debate, political satire, criticism of the government, and even statements of fact could be wrongly classified as hate speech under the new law. This, they warned, could effectively silence dissent and open the door for the government to target activists, journalists, and ordinary social media users.

Concerns Over Police Powers and Preventive Clauses

Beyond free speech, the BJP raised alarms about the expansive powers the bill would grant to authorities. The party alleged that the law would hand excessive powers to the police and the government, a move they believe undermines healthy democratic functioning.

Specific provisions also came under fire. The BJP objected to clauses that deny bail for certain offences outlined in the bill. Furthermore, it highlighted concerns over preventive measures within the legislation that allow for action based merely on the assumption or suspicion that a crime might occur. The protesters warned that such provisions could be weaponized to suppress peaceful protests and target specific individuals or groups.

The bill in question was passed by the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on December 19, amidst significant opposition from the BJP benches. With its passage, Karnataka became the first state in India to enact a standalone law specifically aimed at curbing hate speech and hate crimes. The BJP's protest marks a significant escalation in the political battle over the legislation's future.