The Communist Party of India (Marxist) in Kerala has firmly rejected suggestions of internal party differences concerning the recent appointment of temporary Vice-Chancellors in the state's universities. The political controversy stems from the actions of the state's Chancellor, typically the Governor, who made these appointments without following established consultation procedures.
The Core of the Controversy
According to the CPI(M), the established norm and legal provisions require the Chancellor to consult with the state government before appointing Vice-Chancellors. The party asserts that this crucial step was ignored. Ignoring this provision, the Chancellor unilaterally appointed temporary Vice-Chancellors, a move that has sparked a significant constitutional and administrative dispute. The appointments were made on or before 19 December 2025, the date the news broke.
Government's Legal Challenge
In response to the Chancellor's unilateral decision, the Kerala state government, led by the Left Democratic Front (LDF), opted for a legal recourse. The state government approached the Kerala High Court to challenge the appointments. This legal move underscores the seriousness of the conflict, framing it not just as a political disagreement but as a potential overreach of authority that requires judicial interpretation.
Political Repercussions and Denials
The CPI(M)'s public rejection of internal differences is a strategic move to present a united front. By dismissing rumours of dissent within the party ranks, the leadership aims to consolidate its position and direct public attention squarely onto the actions of the Chancellor. The party's narrative emphasizes a breach of protocol rather than any internal factionalism, portraying the issue as one of procedural propriety versus unilateral authority.
The situation highlights the ongoing tensions between the elected state government and the gubernatorial office in Kerala, a recurring theme in the state's recent political history. The outcome of the High Court petition will be closely watched, as it will set a significant precedent for the appointment processes in state universities and the boundaries of the Chancellor's powers.
