Hariprasad Dismisses Karnataka Turmoil Talks, Says 'Revolution After Sankranti'
Hariprasad: Congress Mandate Belongs to Whole Party

Senior Congress leader B K Hariprasad has firmly dismissed ongoing discussions about political unrest within the Karnataka unit of the party, stating that any talk of a "revolution" should wait until after the Sankranti festival. His comments come amid speculation of internal discord following the party's performance in the state.

Mandate Belongs to the Party, Not Individuals

Addressing the murmurs of dissatisfaction and potential upheaval, Hariprasad was unequivocal in his stance. He emphasized that the mandate secured by the Congress in Karnataka belongs to the party as a whole, not to any single individual or faction. This statement serves as a clear reminder of the collective nature of the party's electoral victory and its subsequent governance.

"The party's decision is final," Hariprasad asserted, underlining the importance of discipline and unity. By making this declaration, he aimed to quell any notions of rebellion or independent action by disgruntled members, reinforcing the central leadership's authority in resolving state-level matters.

Post-Sankranti Timeline for Discussion

In a remark that has captured significant attention, Hariprasad set a specific timeline for any substantive internal debate. He suggested that conversations about a "revolution" or significant change should only be taken up after the Sankranti festival. This traditional harvest festival, celebrated widely in January, acts as an informal deadline, effectively putting a hold on immediate public or internal sparring.

This move is seen as a strategic effort to cool down temperatures within the party ranks and allow for a period of reflection. It pushes potential confrontations into the future, giving the state and central leadership time to manage differences behind closed doors.

Context and Implications

The leader's statements, made and reported on 04 December 2025, directly address the undercurrents of political turmoil reported in various sections of the media. Karnataka has been a critical state for the Congress, and maintaining stability within its unit there is paramount for the party's national ambitions.

Hariprasad's intervention has several key implications:

  • It reinforces party hierarchy: The message is that internal democracy operates within the framework of the party's final decisions.
  • It buys time: By deferring talks to after Sankranti, the leadership creates a cooling-off period.
  • It controls the narrative: Publicly dismissing the turmoil helps project an image of control and unity to the electorate and opponents.

While the comments temporarily sideline public discussion of discord, they also set the stage for a crucial post-festival period where the party's internal dynamics and future strategy in Karnataka will likely be scrutinized and potentially reshaped.