Congress Member of Parliament Deepender Hooda has made serious allegations regarding the recent ceiling collapse incident at the District Courts complex in Panipat, Haryana. The Rajya Sabha MP claims that the failure to properly utilize a sanctioned grant of Rs 18.50 lakh specifically allocated for court renovations directly led to the dangerous mishap.
The Unused Renovation Grant
According to Hooda's revelations, the Haryana government had approved a substantial amount of Rs 18.50 lakh for essential repair and maintenance work at the District Courts complex. This funding was intended to address precisely the type of infrastructure issues that ultimately resulted in the ceiling collapse.
The MP expressed grave concern that despite the availability of these dedicated funds, the necessary renovation work was never completed. The funds remained unutilized while the court building's condition continued to deteriorate, creating unsafe conditions for lawyers, court staff, and the general public who frequent the facility daily.
Political Accountability Demanded
Deepender Hooda has squarely placed responsibility for the incident on the current Haryana administration. He emphasized that the failure to use the allocated money represents a significant administrative failure that has put people's safety at risk.
The Congress leader has called for a thorough investigation into why the Rs 18.50 lakh grant wasn't utilized for its intended purpose. He demands answers about whether the funds were diverted elsewhere or simply left unused due to bureaucratic inefficiency or negligence.
The ceiling collapse incident has raised serious questions about the maintenance of government infrastructure, particularly in crucial institutions like courts that see high public footfall. Hooda's allegations suggest this was not just an unfortunate accident but a preventable tragedy waiting to happen.
Broader Implications for Court Infrastructure
This incident has highlighted larger concerns about the condition of judicial infrastructure across Haryana. The Panipat court mishap serves as a warning about the potential consequences of neglecting maintenance of public buildings.
Legal professionals and court employees have expressed relief that no serious injuries occurred during the ceiling collapse, but concern remains about the overall safety standards being maintained in government buildings. The incident has prompted calls for immediate safety audits of all court complexes in the state.
Hooda's disclosure about the unutilized funds has intensified the political debate around infrastructure management in Haryana. The opposition is likely to use this incident to criticize the government's handling of public funds and infrastructure maintenance.
The Rs 18.50 lakh grant issue has become a focal point for discussions about accountability and proper utilization of public money for essential maintenance work. As investigations continue, pressure is mounting on the administration to explain why preventive measures weren't taken despite available funding.
