Karnataka's 56% Quota Battle: Unpacking the Internal Reservation Faultlines
Inside Karnataka's 56% Reservation Formula Dispute

The political landscape in Karnataka is witnessing a significant storm over reservations, with the state government's move to increase the total quota share to 56% sparking intense debate and revealing deep internal faultlines. At the heart of this controversy is a complex internal reservation dispute, intricately linked to the proposed hike.

The Core of the Controversy: The 6-6-5 Formula

The government's proposed structure, known as the 6-6-5 formula, is a direct outcome of the newly introduced 17% reservation for Scheduled Castes (SCs). This formula aims to distribute benefits within the SC community itself, a move that has become a flashpoint for disagreement among various sub-groups. The attempt to reallocate quotas internally is what is fueling much of the current political and social friction, making the broader goal of reaching 56% total reservation a highly contentious issue.

Understanding the Reservation Storm

The issue came to the forefront with reports published on 07 December 2025. The push to elevate the state's reservation ceiling is not merely a numerical increase but is fundamentally tied to addressing long-standing demands for equitable distribution within already reserved categories. Analysts point out that the government's strategy of using the 6-6-5 framework to implement the enhanced SC quota has inadvertently opened up old wounds and created new alliances and oppositions within Karnataka's diverse social fabric.

Implications and the Road Ahead

The ramifications of this dispute are far-reaching. Legal experts are scrutinizing whether the total 56% quota will withstand judicial review, given the Supreme Court's established ceiling guidelines. Furthermore, the internal reservation conflict threatens to alter political equations in the state, with various communities mobilizing to protect or enhance their share. The government, led by the reported analysis of Sujay B M, finds itself navigating a delicate path between fulfilling promises to specific constituencies and maintaining social harmony.

As the debate rages on, the people of Karnataka are left watching a high-stakes political and legal battle unfold. The outcome will not only define the state's reservation policy for years to come but will also set a precedent for how internal caste dynamics are managed within India's affirmative action framework. The resolution of this internal reservation dispute is now the key to unlocking the broader 56% quota proposal.