A community panchayat in Rajasthan's Jalore district has issued a controversial diktat, prohibiting young women and daughters-in-law from using mobile phones equipped with cameras. This decision, set to take effect from January 26, applies to residents across 15 villages.
The Panchayat's Decree and Its Rationale
The ruling was established during a meeting of the Chaudhary community from Sundhamata Patti, held in Gazipur village on Sunday. The gathering was chaired by Sujnaram Chaudhary, who serves as the president for 14 'pattis'. The panchayat members attributed their drastic move to the growing concerns over smartphone addiction and the pervasive influence of social media reels among the youth.
Panchayat representative Himmtaram publicly announced the verdict. He stated that after extensive discussions, a consensus was reached. Daughters-in-law and young women, particularly those attending school or college, will now be restricted to using only basic keypad phones. Smartphones with cameras are effectively banned for this demographic.
Strict Rules for Phone Usage
The restrictions extend beyond mere possession. The panchayat has also forbidden these women from carrying any mobile phone to public gatherings. This includes social events like weddings, functions at a neighbour's house, or any other public occasion.
The panchayat did make a minor concession for educational purposes. If a school-going girl absolutely requires a phone for her studies, she may use it strictly within the confines of her home. Taking the device outside, even to a neighbour's residence, remains prohibited under the new rules.
Community Leaders Defend the Decision
Defending the decision, Sujanaram Choudhary emphasized that the community meeting reached a unanimous agreement on the need to protect the younger generation from the potential misuse of mobile phones. The leaders expressed a belief that limiting access to advanced technology would shield the community's cultural values and curb distractions.
This decision highlights the ongoing tension between traditional community governance and modern digital lifestyles in parts of rural India. It places significant restrictions on the mobility and digital access of women in the named villages, raising questions about personal freedom and autonomy.
The enforcement of this ban and its social repercussions will be closely watched as the January 26 deadline approaches. The move has sparked a debate on the role of community bodies in regulating personal technology use, especially concerning women's rights and access to information.
