Karnataka High Court Directs RSS to Submit Fresh Plea for Chittapur Route March
Karnataka HC Asks RSS to File Fresh March Petition

In a significant legal development, the Karnataka High Court has instructed the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) to file a fresh petition seeking authorization for their proposed route march in Chittapur. The court's directive came during recent proceedings that highlighted procedural shortcomings in the organization's initial application.

The bench, comprising Justice M. Nagaprasanna, pointed out specific deficiencies in the original petition that necessitated a revised submission. While the court didn't elaborate on the exact nature of these shortcomings, legal experts suggest they likely relate to documentation or procedural compliance requirements.

Legal Hurdles for Planned Event

The RSS had planned to conduct a route march in Chittapur town, located in Karnataka's Kalaburagi district, as part of their organizational activities. However, the event faced regulatory obstacles when local authorities raised concerns or failed to grant necessary permissions promptly.

Court's Specific Directions:

  • RSS must submit completely new petition documents
  • Original petition contained unspecified procedural flaws
  • Fresh application must address all legal requirements
  • Court will reconsider the matter after new submission

Broader Implications

This case highlights the ongoing legal and administrative challenges faced by various organizations when planning public events in Karnataka. The court's insistence on proper procedure underscores the importance of complete compliance with regulatory frameworks for public gatherings.

The RSS, known for its disciplined organizational structure and regular public activities, now faces the task of rectifying the identified issues in their application. Legal observers note that such procedural requirements have become increasingly stringent in recent years, particularly for events involving large public participation.

The matter is expected to proceed once the RSS legal team prepares and submits the revised petition, with further court hearings likely to determine the final outcome of their permission request.