Karnataka High Court Delivers Mixed Verdict in HD Revanna Case
In a significant development, the Karnataka High Court has granted partial relief to former minister HD Revanna while dealing with criminal charges against him. The court delivered a mixed verdict that has important implications for the ongoing legal proceedings.
Court Sets Aside One Charge, Upholds Another
Justice M I Arun, while presiding over the case, set aside the offence under IPC Section 344 against Revanna. This particular section deals with wrongful confinement for the purpose of extorting property or constraining to an illegal act. The court's decision to quash this charge represents a legal victory for the political leader.
However, in what marks a crucial setback for Revanna, the High Court upheld the charge under IPC Section 354A which specifically deals with sexual harassment. This means the case regarding sexual harassment allegations will continue to proceed through the legal system.
Limitation Period Examination Ordered
Justice Arun's ruling included an important directive to the trial court regarding the limitation period. The judge has directed the trial court to examine whether the charge under IPC Section 354A can be invoked despite the lapse of the limitation period as prescribed under CrPC Section 468.
This examination of the limitation period becomes critical because CrPC Section 468 typically bars prosecution for certain offences after the expiry of the prescribed period. The trial court will now need to determine whether this legal technicality affects the sexual harassment case against Revanna.
The order was passed on November 21, 2025, and represents the latest chapter in the legal challenges facing the prominent political figure. The case has been closely watched given Revanna's political stature and the serious nature of the allegations involved.
Legal Implications and Next Steps
The High Court's decision creates a complex legal scenario where one charge has been dismissed while another remains active, subject to the limitation period examination. Legal experts suggest that the limitation period issue could become a pivotal factor in determining the future course of the sexual harassment case.
The case now returns to the trial court with specific directions from the High Court. The trial court must conduct a thorough examination of whether the sexual harassment charge can proceed despite potential limitation period issues, making this the next critical phase in the legal proceedings.
This development comes at a time when sexual harassment cases involving public figures are receiving increased public and media attention across India. The court's careful distinction between different charges demonstrates the nuanced approach required in such sensitive legal matters.
