In a move that has sparked widespread criticism and concerns about investigative overreach, Karnataka's Special Investigation Team (SIT) has taken the unusual step of physically pasting copies of notices on the homes of several activists involved in the ongoing D-stamp paper scam investigation.
The controversial action occurred across multiple locations in Karnataka, with SIT officials directly affixing the legal documents to the residences of individuals summoned for questioning. This unconventional method of serving notices has raised eyebrows among legal experts and civil rights advocates who question both the necessity and the implications of such tactics.
Legal Community Raises Alarm
Legal professionals across the state have expressed deep concern about the SIT's approach. This method of serving notices appears designed to publicly label and intimidate individuals before any formal charges have been proven, potentially violating fundamental principles of due process and the presumption of innocence.
One senior advocate, speaking on condition of anonymity, noted that while investigation agencies have broad powers, "the manner of exercising these powers must respect constitutional safeguards and individual dignity."
Activists Decry Intimidation Tactics
The affected activists and their supporters have condemned the SIT's actions as a clear attempt to intimidate and publicly shame them. Many see this as part of a broader pattern of pressure tactics being employed in the high-profile D-stamp paper case, which involves allegations of massive fraud and corruption.
Community organizations and human rights groups have called for immediate intervention to ensure that the investigation proceeds without what they characterize as "extra-legal intimidation methods" that could prejudice both public opinion and the legal process.
Ongoing D-Stamp Paper Investigation
The SIT has been investigating the multi-crore D-stamp paper scam, which involves alleged irregularities in the production and distribution of stamp papers across Karnataka. The investigation has already seen several high-profile arrests and continues to expand in scope.
However, the latest development has shifted attention from the substance of the investigation to the methods being employed by the investigating agency, raising important questions about the balance between effective law enforcement and the protection of individual rights.
As the controversy grows, all eyes are on how the SIT will respond to the criticism and whether judicial authorities will intervene to address concerns about investigative procedures in this high-stakes case.
