Karnataka Assembly Speaker UT Khader issued a sharp rebuke to opposition legislators on Monday for storming the well of the House during a heated debate on a proposed bill aimed at curbing hate speech. The incident, which occurred on 22 December 2025, disrupted the proceedings as members protested during the discussion.
Legislative Business Amidst Disruption
Despite the uproar, Speaker Khader highlighted the substantial legislative work accomplished during the session. He pointed out that a total of 22 bills were tabled before the Assembly. Furthermore, the House managed to pass 23 Bills, demonstrating progress on the government's agenda even amidst the political friction.
Key Bills Passed Including Land Revenue Amendment
Among the significant legislations that cleared the Assembly was the Karnataka Land Revenue (Second Amendment) Bill. This important piece of legislation had been under scrutiny and was previously sent to a legislative committee for detailed examination in the prior session. Its passage marks a key development in the state's land administration policies.
The Speaker's remarks underscored a contrast between the opposition's disruptive tactics and the Assembly's constitutional duty to conduct legislative business. He emphasised the need for decorum and constructive debate, especially on sensitive issues like the proposed law against hate speech, which was at the centre of the controversy.
Session's Outcome and Political Implications
The day's events in the Karnataka Vidhana Soudha reflect the heightened political tensions surrounding contentious legislation. While the treasury bench succeeded in pushing through a slate of bills, the opposition's protest signals intense debates to come, particularly on laws affecting social harmony and land rights. The passage of the Land Revenue Amendment Bill, following committee review, shows a procedural path for complex legislation even in a charged atmosphere.
The session, which concluded late on December 22nd, ultimately saw the government's legislative priorities advance, but not without clear signs of the deep political divides within the state assembly.
