Karnataka's 5 Guarantee Schemes Boost Economy, State Debt at 2.9% vs Centre's 4.4%
Karnataka's Guarantee Schemes Fuel Growth, State Debt Under Limit

In a robust defense of the state's welfare policies, a political analyst has revealed that Karnataka has successfully managed its finances, keeping its borrowing well within prescribed limits even after rolling out its flagship five guarantee schemes. The state's fiscal discipline stands in contrast to the central government's borrowing, showcasing a model where social spending and economic prudence can coexist.

Fiscal Prudence Amidst Welfare Push

Speaking at a review meeting in Dakshina Kannada district on Tuesday, political analyst and Jagrutha Karnataka convenor Vasu HV presented compelling data. He stated that despite the massive investment in the five guarantee schemes, Karnataka has maintained its state loan limit at 3% of the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP). In practice, the state has availed loans amounting to only 2.9% of its GSDP.

This figure becomes more significant when compared to the borrowing pattern of the central government, which, according to Vasu, stands at 4.4%. This comparison highlights Karnataka's relative fiscal restraint even as it executes expensive public welfare programs.

Economic Multiplier Effect in Action

Vasu addressed the initial criticism head-on, noting that both the opposition and some within the ruling party had feared the schemes would halt development and bankrupt the state. However, the reality has been strikingly different. He argued that the Rs 51,000 crore invested in the guarantees is a strategic political move designed to ensure money flows directly into the hands of the people.

This injection of capital has had a tangible multiplier effect. "People acquired purchasing power, and this led to an increase in the state revenue," Vasu explained. The most direct evidence of this is the state's GST collection, which he claims is double the national average, primarily driven by the enhanced spending capacity of Karnataka's citizens post-implementation of the schemes.

Beyond immediate relief, Vasu framed the guarantees as a developmental tool. "Guarantee schemes also cater to development and create employment," he said. He emphasized the government's duty to either provide jobs to educated youth or offer financial support based on their qualifications, a demand he sees as universal.

The Challenge of Ensuring Accurate Delivery

The review meeting also shed light on the operational challenges facing the schemes. HM Revanna, Chairman of the Karnataka State Guarantee Schemes Implementation Authority, pointed out a critical issue: the need to prevent pilferage of funds. He revealed a startling instance of systemic leakage, where funds totaling Rs 68 lakh were transferred to the accounts of 1.4 lakh beneficiaries even after their death.

"This is people's money, and we have to ensure that the funds reserved for the guarantee schemes reach the right beneficiaries," Revanna asserted, underscoring the administration's focus on plugging such gaps to improve efficiency and transparency.

The discussion in Mangaluru presents a two-sided narrative: one of macroeconomic success where welfare spending appears to stimulate revenue, and another of micro-level administrative hurdles that need constant vigilance. The state's ability to balance its books while pursuing an ambitious social agenda is now a key point of analysis and political discourse.