Punjab HC Demands Affidavit on Panchayat Ballot Custody Amid Vote Count Concerns
Punjab HC Seeks Affidavit on Panchayat Ballot Custody

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has raised serious concerns about potential irregularities in the counting process for panchayat elections in Punjab, directing state authorities to submit a comprehensive affidavit detailing the custody and handling of ballot papers.

Court Intervention in Election Process

During a recent hearing, the division bench comprising Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Kuldeep Tiwari expressed apprehension about possible mischief in the vote counting procedure for panchayat polls. The court specifically highlighted concerns about the integrity of the election process and the safeguarding of democratic principles at the grassroots level.

The judicial intervention came while addressing a petition filed by Kulwinder Kaur and other candidates who contested in the recent panchayat elections. The petitioners raised allegations regarding the transparency and fairness of the electoral process, prompting the court to examine the matter closely.

Detailed Affidavit Requirements

The High Court has mandated that the Punjab State Election Commission must file a detailed affidavit covering several critical aspects of the election process. This affidavit must specifically address:

  • The complete chain of custody for all ballot papers
  • Security measures implemented during ballot storage
  • Procedures followed during the vote counting process
  • Mechanisms to prevent tampering or manipulation

The court emphasized that the affidavit should provide a clear and comprehensive timeline of how the ballots were handled from the time of voting through the counting process. This includes documentation of who had access to the ballots and under what circumstances.

Broader Implications for Democratic Process

This judicial scrutiny comes at a crucial time when local governance institutions are playing an increasingly important role in rural development. Panchayats serve as the foundation of India's democratic structure at the village level, making the integrity of their elections paramount.

The court's intervention underscores the importance of transparent electoral processes in maintaining public trust in democratic institutions. By demanding accountability from election authorities, the judiciary is reinforcing the principle that every vote must be counted fairly and accurately.

The next hearing in this case has been scheduled, and the court has made it clear that it will closely monitor the implementation of its directives. The outcome of this case could potentially set important precedents for how panchayat elections are conducted and monitored across the state.

Legal experts suggest that this development highlights the growing judicial oversight of electoral processes at all levels of governance. The court's proactive approach demonstrates the judiciary's commitment to upholding democratic values and ensuring free and fair elections.