Telangana Villages Tense as Mass Dog Killings Spark Police Cases
Telangana Dog Killings: Villages Tense, Police Book 15

Mass Dog Killings in Telangana Villages Trigger Police Action

Two Telangana districts witnessed shocking mass killings of stray dogs this week. Villagers took matters into their own hands, resulting in police cases and widespread tension across rural communities.

Scale of the Killings

Local police officials confirmed grim numbers. In Kamareddy district alone, over 100 dogs were killed during this week. Hanamkonda district reported an even higher toll with 120 canine deaths.

"Our New Year resolution was to end the dog menace in our village," revealed a 37-year-old shop owner from Bhavanipet village in Kamareddy. He spoke on condition of anonymity, reflecting the sensitive nature of the situation.

Villagers' Desperation and Methods

Approximately 60 to 70 families in affected villages collaborated on what they called a "solution." They engaged local "fixers" or pest controllers to systematically eliminate stray dogs from their communities.

"I met with an accident while being chased by a dog two months ago," the Bhavanipet villager explained. "There are children who have suffered dog bites. What are we to do other than to get rid of them?"

From Kamareddy, a disturbing video surfaced on Tuesday showing a man injecting dogs. The visual evidence added to the growing controversy surrounding these actions.

Police Response and Legal Action

Telangana police responded swiftly to the killings. They booked 15 individuals, including six village sarpanches from both districts. Charges were filed under Section 325 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for killing or poisoning animals, along with violations of the Prevention of Cruelty towards Animals Act.

In Hanamkonda's Shayampet and Arepally gram panchayat limits specifically, police booked nine people. A senior police official from Hanamkonda disclosed, "We got a complaint from a local animal welfare NGO and discovered a mass grave filled with about 120 dog carcasses."

Sarpanches Defend Their Position

One booked sarpanch defended the collective decision. "It was the collective decision of all villagers. I just did not stand in their way. How is that a crime?" she questioned.

Another sarpanch, booked along with her husband, claimed practical necessity. "Every year, 10 to 15 people complain of dog bites. We could not have ignored the problem," she stated.

Political Context and Promises

The issue carries political undertones. At least 16 sarpanches, running as independent candidates with informal party backing, had promised to end the stray dog menace this year during their campaigns.

"They asked for votes with this promise," a villager noted. "When that did not happen, pest controllers were brought in."

In Arepally village, a local politician pledged support for sarpanches fighting the legal case, indicating community backing for their actions.

Animal Rights Activists React

Animal rights activists strongly condemned the killings. They decried both the inhuman methods used and the illegal nature of the mass culling. Their complaints to authorities triggered the police investigations that uncovered the mass graves.

Historical Context and Failed Systems

Until last year, villages employed dog catchers to remove strays. However, most captured dogs returned to the same villages after vaccination and sterilization, frustrating residents.

"We made several representations during the past two years to district collectors and other district administration staff, but all this fell on deaf ears," claimed one villager, explaining their desperation.

Health Context and Government Response

District administration authorities revealed an important detail. Neither Kamareddy nor Hanamkonda districts reported any rabies cases in the past year, despite the perceived dog menace.

A villager whose six-year-old son was chased by a dog articulated the community's demand clearly. "We needed assurance from the government that they will tackle the dog problem," he said.

Political Parties Remain Cautious

The ruling Congress party in Telangana offered no official comment on the killings. This silence persisted despite their December claim that sarpanches backed by them had swept the elections.

A Congress leader did offer general guidance, stating, "We have told all elected representatives to be kind to animals even as they safeguard the lives of their constituents."

The BJP and BRS maintained similar silence. A BJP leader simply remarked, "We do not want people to break the law," without directly addressing the specific incidents.

Broader Implications

These events highlight the complex conflict between public safety concerns and animal welfare laws in rural India. They expose failed municipal systems for managing stray populations while demonstrating how desperation can lead to illegal collective action.

The Telangana High Court had previously ordered immediate and detailed compliance from GHMC regarding stray dog capture and rehabilitation. The recent killings suggest implementation gaps at the ground level.

As police cases proceed and communities remain on edge, this incident raises difficult questions about governance, animal management, and rural safety that extend far beyond Telangana's borders.