KPMG Pulls AI Report After Companies Call Case Studies Fabricated
KPMG Pulls AI Report Over Fabricated Case Studies

KPMG has retracted its global report on “Agentic AI” after several major companies and organizations named in it complained that their supposed achievements were completely fabricated. The professional services giant published the report titled “Redefining Excellence in the Age of Agentic AI,” which contained numerous false claims and bogus case studies, according to a report by The Financial Times. The companies allege that the fabricated success stories appear to have been generated by artificial intelligence (AI) “hallucinations” – situations where an AI model confidently includes incorrect facts in its responses, which KPMG’s human staff failed to catch.

Discovery of Inaccuracies

The inaccuracies were first identified by the tech research group GPTZero and later verified by the Financial Times. After being alerted to the fake data, several high-profile organizations, including Swiss bank UBS, the UK's National Health Service (NHS), and major public transit agencies, forced KPMG to remove the publication from its websites.

What the KPMG Report Claimed and What Companies Said

KPMG’s report claimed that global organizations were successfully deploying highly advanced “AI agents” to handle complex, automated tasks. However, the organizations involved quickly clarified the reality.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

UBS Bank

The report claimed that the global wealth manager integrated AI agents across its investment advisory and risk management systems using a custom platform built with Microsoft. A spokesperson for UBS reportedly told reporters the claims were “factually incorrect” and demanded their removal.

Swiss Federal Railways

KPMG wrote that the railway used AI agents to help users seamlessly plan and book journeys based on real-time conditions and carbon footprints. A railway spokesperson confirmed the claims were “not accurate.”

Transport for London (TfL)

The study claimed London’s transit system was using AI agents to predict congestion and coordinate city transport – a claim dubbed “misleading” by a TfL spokesperson.

NHS Greater Manchester

The report claimed the health service used AI agents to organize patient data, automate referrals, and predict hospital readmissions. A spokesperson revealed the claim “doesn't really align” with reality.

‘Poisoning the Well’ of Trust

The KPMG scandal is the second major event of its kind. Just last month, rival firm EY was forced to retract a major study after GPTZero caught fake footnotes and other AI-generated errors in its text. As the “Big Four” accounting and consulting firms are typically viewed as highly credible, their failure to fact-check their own work creates a dangerous ripple effect.

“They poison the well of information,” said Edward Tian, chief executive of GPTZero. Tian pointed out that before KPMG pulled the report, its fake findings had already been cited by multiple tech industry publications and a major European newspaper.

KPMG Launches Investigation

A spokesperson for KPMG International stated that the firm takes the “accuracy and integrity of its published content seriously” and confirmed the report has been removed while a full internal investigation takes place. The firm admitted that its own employees likely broke internal rules regarding artificial intelligence. “We expect all our people to follow our guidelines on the responsible use of AI, including human oversight to validate content and verify independent sources,” the spokesman was quoted as saying.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration