Kevin O'Leary Warns US: Heavy AI Regulation Could Cost Global Leadership
O'Leary: US AI Leadership at Risk from Over-Regulation

Kevin O'Leary Issues Stark Warning on US AI Regulation

Canadian billionaire investor and former Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary has strongly advised the United States government to steer clear of adopting Europe's heavy-handed regulatory approach. In a compelling argument, O'Leary cautioned that such a move could severely undermine America's position in the fiercely competitive global artificial intelligence race.

Historical Lessons from Europe's Regulatory Missteps

During an interview with Fox News, O'Leary pointed to Europe's post-World War II era as a cautionary tale. He explained that the continent's imposition of an excessively burdensome regulatory framework drove innovators and capital away, ultimately benefiting the United States. "After the Second World War, they screwed themselves. They put a regulatory environment in so onerous that everybody just brought their dough to the United States and developed their companies here. And stole the people that were innovators," O'Leary stated emphatically.

Contrast with Pro-Business Models Like the UAE

O'Leary further highlighted the contrasting success of the United Arab Emirates, which he praised for its business-friendly policies. He noted that the UAE has rapidly ascended to become the third-ranked player in AI globally, largely due to its minimal regulatory interference. "They innovate, they're number three in AI now. And they have nothing to do with Europe in terms of regulations," he added, underscoring the advantage of a lighter regulatory touch.

Critical Challenges: Energy Infrastructure and Chip Policies

Beyond regulation, O'Leary identified two other major threats to US AI supremacy. First, he warned that America's aging power grid is ill-equipped to meet the soaring energy demands of AI data centers, while China is aggressively expanding its power capacity. Second, he criticized US export restrictions on AI chips, arguing that selling these technologies globally—even to rivals—would bolster American dominance and attract top international talent. "We should keep bringing over any genius from anywhere and train them here otherwise the Chinese will," O'Leary asserted, emphasizing the importance of talent acquisition.

The Future of AI Leadership: Energy, Talent, and Funding

For O'Leary, maintaining AI leadership hinges not just on financial investment but on reliable and affordable energy, coupled with the ability to draw global innovators. He cited NASA's post-World War II recruitment of German rocket scientists as a historical precedent for how talent migration can decisively shape technological leadership. This example illustrates that strategic openness, rather than restrictive policies, is key to sustaining competitive advantage in cutting-edge fields like artificial intelligence.