Bill Clinton Defends Epstein Ties Under Oath in Historic Congressional Deposition
In a landmark event, former President Bill Clinton faced a rigorous congressional deposition in Chappaqua, New York, where he staunchly defended his associations with the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. Under oath, Clinton asserted that he perceived nothing improper in his interactions with Epstein, despite intense questioning from Republican lawmakers.
Clinton's Testimony Amid Republican Scrutiny
The deposition, held on February 28, 2026, marked a significant moment in congressional oversight, as Republicans sought to delve into the nature of Clinton's relationship with Epstein, who was convicted of sex trafficking charges. Clinton, responding to the grilling, emphasized that his dealings with Epstein were limited and above board, stating, "I saw nothing wrong" in their ties. This testimony comes amid ongoing investigations and public scrutiny into Epstein's network of high-profile connections.
Key Points from the Deposition
- Clinton testified that his interactions with Epstein were primarily related to philanthropic and business matters, with no knowledge of Epstein's criminal activities.
- He faced pointed questions from Republican members about the frequency and context of their meetings, which Clinton described as infrequent and professional.
- The deposition highlighted the broader political tensions, with Democrats criticizing the inquiry as a partisan effort, while Republicans argued it was necessary for transparency.
Context and Implications
This congressional deposition is part of a larger effort to investigate Epstein's associations following his death in 2019. Clinton's testimony adds to the public record, as lawmakers and the public seek clarity on the extent of Epstein's influence. The event underscores the ongoing debates over accountability and the role of congressional oversight in addressing controversial figures.
In summary, Bill Clinton's defense of his Epstein ties under oath in Chappaqua represents a pivotal chapter in the unfolding saga, with potential ramifications for political and legal narratives moving forward.
