Hindu Group Slams Kanye West for Swastika-Nazi Conflation, Calls for Correction
Hindu Group Criticizes Kanye West Over Swastika Remarks

Hindu Advocacy Group Condemns Kanye West's Swastika Comments as Historically Inaccurate

A prominent North American Hindu advocacy organization has issued a strong criticism of controversial US rapper Kanye West, known professionally as Ye, for his recent remarks equating the ancient swastika symbol with Nazi imagery. The Coalition of Hindus of North America (CoHNA) has described Ye's statements as "deeply insulting" and fundamentally incorrect from a historical perspective.

Offense to Billions and Religious Traditions

CoHNA representatives emphasized that Ye's comments have offended approximately two billion people worldwide who consider the swastika a sacred religious emblem. The organization argues that such conflations perpetuate long-standing misconceptions about Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain traditions, undermining their cultural and spiritual significance.

This controversy emerges following Ye's recent apology for previous antisemitic remarks, during which he stated he had "gravitated towards the most destructive symbol" he could find, specifically referencing the swastika. CoHNA has countered this framing by pointing out crucial historical distinctions that Ye's comments overlook.

Historical Distinction Between Symbols

The organization has highlighted that Adolf Hitler never described the Nazi emblem as a swastika, but rather as the Hakenkreuz, or "hooked cross." This linguistic and symbolic distinction forms the core of CoHNA's argument against Ye's characterization.

"For thousands of years, the swastika has symbolised auspiciousness, good fortune and well-being in Dharmic traditions," stated CoHNA president Nikunj Trivedi. "Equating it with a symbol of hate is deeply offensive and undermines the religious freedom of millions who use this sacred symbol in their daily lives."

Call for Media Correction and Legal Recognition

CoHNA has formally called upon The Wall Street Journal, where Ye's remarks appeared in a paid advertisement, to issue a correction that clearly distinguishes between the Nazi symbol and the religious swastika used in Eastern traditions. The group noted that this distinction has already received formal recognition from lawmakers in certain regions of the United States and Canada, reflecting growing awareness of the symbol's dual historical narratives.

Pattern of Controversial Behavior

Ye's latest comments occur within a broader context of erratic and controversial public behavior that has spanned several years. The artist has faced global condemnation for:

  • Antisemitic statements
  • Public praise for extremist figures
  • Incorporation of Nazi imagery in music, fashion, and public appearances

These actions have resulted in major brands and business partners severing ties with Ye, while his public statements have frequently been followed by clarifications or apologies that reference his documented struggles with mental health, including bipolar disorder.

Broader Implications for Dharmic Communities

For Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain communities worldwide, this issue extends far beyond Ye as an individual. The swastika has become a focal point in global efforts to:

  1. Reclaim the symbol's original meaning as one of peace, prosperity, and spiritual significance
  2. Contextualize its millennia-old history distinct from its 20th-century appropriation by Nazi Germany
  3. Advocate for public awareness, educational reform, and legal clarity

Community leaders emphasize that these efforts aim to protect religious freedom and cultural heritage without minimizing the atrocities committed under Nazi symbolism. "Both historical truth and moral clarity are possible," CoHNA has argued, stressing that acknowledging the horrors of Nazism should not necessitate stigmatizing ancient religious traditions.

Historical Context of Misinformation

The confusion between the swastika and Nazi symbolism has deep historical roots dating to the early 20th century. English-language media began translating Hakenkreuz as "swastika" while reporting on the rise of Nazi Germany, creating a linguistic shortcut that eventually hardened into convention, particularly during and after World War II.

Over subsequent decades, Western understanding of the word "swastika" became almost entirely defined by Nazism, effectively erasing its thousands-of-years-old religious and cultural history. In Dharmic traditions, the swastika predates Nazism by millennia and continues to symbolize:

  • Good fortune and auspiciousness
  • Continuity and cyclical nature of life
  • Spiritual well-being and prosperity

Ongoing Reclamation Efforts

In recent years, Hindu and interfaith groups have intensified efforts to reclaim the symbol's original meaning through multiple approaches:

  1. Public education campaigns about the symbol's dual histories
  2. Academic engagement with historical and religious scholars
  3. Legal clarification initiatives in various legislatures

Several North American legislative bodies have formally recognized the distinction between the Nazi Hakenkreuz and the religious swastika, reflecting growing awareness that precision matters profoundly when dealing with symbols connected to both genocide and living faith traditions.

This incident marks not the first time Ye has faced criticism from Hindu groups. In 2025, CoHNA previously objected to merchandise bearing Nazi imagery that was mislabeled as featuring swastikas, again warning against the conflation of these distinct symbols.