Indian-American Community Rallies Against Viral H-1B Video Claims
Indian-American investors and advocacy organizations have united to systematically dismantle Texas woman Sara Gonzales's widely circulated H-1B visa expose, firmly asserting that she fundamentally misunderstands how H-1B staffing operates within the United States. The controversy centers around Gonzales's viral video investigation targeting two specific companies: 3Bees Technologies and Qubitz Tech Systems.
Questioning the Investigation Methodology
In her video that has sparked intense debate, Gonzales claimed that these two companies hired H-1B workers but maintained no physical offices at their registered addresses. She documented visits to these locations, stating she found no traditional workplace settings. This approach has drawn significant criticism from those familiar with modern business structures and immigration law.
Legal Defense from Advocacy Leaders
Rajeev Sharma, co-founder of the Indian American Advocacy Council, provided a robust legal perspective on the matter. "It is completely legal to initiate a business using a home address," Sharma emphasized, drawing parallels to industry giants. "This is precisely how companies like Apple, Google, Amazon, and Disney began their journeys—from garages and home offices."
Sharma further argued that legal immigrants pursuing entrepreneurial ventures should not face harassment for following established procedures. He raised pointed questions about Gonzales's own status, suggesting she might be residing in the United States without proper documentation while targeting those navigating the system legally.
The Confrontation That Sparked Controversy
The video's most dramatic moment occurred when Gonzales visited the residence of Hari Madiraju, identified as the visa contact person for Qubitz Tech Systems. During the encounter, she questioned whether twelve H-1B workers he reportedly hired were operating from his home. Madiraju responded by contacting emergency services, telling dispatchers: "Somebody is knocking on my door and then they are like threatening me. ... Please, can you help me?"
This interaction generated strong reactions from 'America First' activists who questioned Madiraju's response. They argued that if his business practices were entirely legitimate, he should have clarified the situation rather than immediately involving law enforcement.
Industry Experts Explain Standard Practices
James Blunt, a US-based entrepreneur with extensive knowledge of immigration staffing, provided crucial context about standard industry operations. "Staffing companies hiring H-1B professionals on behalf of IT firms represents a completely legal and well-established practice," Blunt explained.
He elaborated further: "Contracting workers to end clients doesn't raise red flags—it forms the fundamental structure of staffing and consulting industries. This arrangement is explicitly permitted under current regulations and represents commonplace business operations. Labeling it as 'unusual' doesn't make it unlawful; it simply demonstrates a lack of understanding about how these systems function."
Understanding Legal H-1B Staffing Parameters
Industry professionals have outlined several key indicators of legitimate H-1B staffing operations:
- The client's address must be properly listed on the Labor Condition Application (LCA)
- Candidate wages must correspond accurately with the LCA location specifications
- A genuine employment relationship must exist between all parties
- Home-based work arrangements should be infrequent or follow hybrid models with local requirements
- Listing a Limited Liability Company address at an owner's residence doesn't imply all H-1B candidates work exclusively from that location
- Primary operational offices can exist at separate locations within the same city where daily business activities occur
Cultural Connections and Additional Context
Gonzales noted potential cultural connections in her investigation, observing that both companies appear linked to Telugu communities. She specifically mentioned that phone numbers listed on the 3Bees Technologies website originate from India, with a registered address in Telangana. The company's director, president, and agent was identified as Vamsi Krishna Vajinapally according to her research.
The broader conversation highlights tensions between immigration scrutiny and legitimate business practices, with Indian-American investors emphasizing that following established legal pathways should not automatically trigger suspicion or public shaming campaigns.
