SSR Family Challenges CBI Closure Report as 'Eyewash'
Sushant Singh Rajput's family vows to challenge CBI's closure report in the high-profile death case, alleging it's a cover-up and demanding justice for the late Bollywood actor.
Sushant Singh Rajput's family vows to challenge CBI's closure report in the high-profile death case, alleging it's a cover-up and demanding justice for the late Bollywood actor.
Allahabad High Court's landmark judgment states that implied meanings in WhatsApp messages can constitute promoting enmity. Learn how digital communication is being reinterpreted in Indian law.
In a significant legal development, a Belgian court has dismissed fugitive diamantaire Mehul Choksi's claims of potential unfair trial and ill-treatment in India, dealing a major blow to his attempts to avoid extradition for his alleged involvement in the
In an extraordinary display of judicial perseverance, the Supreme Court of India ensures a widow receives her rightful railway compensation after fighting for 23 years. Read this inspiring story of justice delayed but not denied.
In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India intervenes to ensure a widow receives rightful compensation from Indian Railways after fighting for 23 years. Read the inspiring story of judicial perseverance.
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court dismisses a plea seeking to quash a police case, emphasizing that no extraordinary circumstances warrant judicial interference at this stage.
In a significant administrative reshuffle, the Haryana government has promoted nine Additional District and Sessions Judges to the District and Sessions Judge rank, marking a crucial step in strengthening the state's judicial infrastructure.
In a landmark judgment, Karnataka High Court dismisses divorce appeal, stating husband cannot expect wife to be 'obedient maid' while upholding marriage sanctity and gender equality.
In a landmark move, the Punjab and Haryana High Court designates 76 distinguished advocates as Senior Counsel, marking one of the largest elevations in Indian judicial history.
In a historic development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has designated 76 advocates as Senior Advocates, marking one of the largest such elevations in Indian judicial history. Discover the significance and implications of this massive recognition.
In a significant administrative move, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ordered the transfer and posting of 27 judicial officers across various districts, aiming to optimize judicial efficiency and district management.
Telangana High Court orders thorough investigation into alleged custodial torture in Nagarkurnool, demanding CCTV footage and medical reports. Learn about the shocking case that exposes police brutality.
Discover fascinating cases where Indian judiciary intervened in film censorship, challenging CBFC decisions and shaping cinematic freedom in India.
Delhi High Court delivers crucial judgment emphasizing need for corroborative evidence in rape cases, dismissing appeal where only physical relations were established without proof of lack of consent.
In a historic move, the Punjab and Haryana High Court designates 76 advocates as senior counsel, marking one of the largest elevations in Indian judicial history. Discover the complete list and significance.
In a significant administrative overhaul, Punjab and Haryana High Court transfers 19 judicial officers across both states. Get the complete list and details of this major judicial reshuffle.
Explore how social media is transforming judicial accountability in India as judges face trial by public opinion. Discover the delicate balance between transparency and judicial independence.
In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has designated seven distinguished advocates as Senior Advocates, recognizing their exceptional legal expertise and contributions to the judiciary.
In a landmark ruling, Punjab & Haryana High Court condemns violent land grabs, asserting that property ownership must be determined through legal channels, not brute force and intimidation tactics.
Delhi High Court Judge Justice Prathiba Singh makes history with her appointment as Chairperson of WIPO's Advisory Board of Judges, marking a significant achievement for India's judicial system on the global stage.
In a significant legal development, the Delhi High Court has directed a fresh review of 1993 Delhi bomb blasts convict Devinderpal Singh Bhullar's case, potentially reopening a decades-old terrorism conviction that shook the nation.
A senior IFS officer's bold revelation about judicial overreach sparks nationwide debate on constitutional boundaries between judiciary and executive branches in India's governance.
A Chandigarh court acquits a man accused of assaulting police officials, citing compromised evidence including torn police jackets and malfunctioning body cameras that failed to record the alleged incident.
Shocking backlog of 8.8 lakh execution petitions across India prompts Supreme Court intervention. Learn how the judiciary plans to tackle this massive pendency crisis affecting justice delivery.
In an unprecedented judicial development, 16 judges have recused themselves from hearing whistleblower protection cases, raising serious questions about judicial independence and case management.
After 11 years in Meerut jail without trial because he couldn't afford a lawyer, a Uttar Pradesh man finally walks free in a shocking case of justice delayed and denied.
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court dismisses a plea seeking protective custody for trafficking survivors, raising concerns about victim protection mechanisms in India.
Supreme Court Judge Justice Bela M Trivedi emphasizes that justice should never be sacrificed for procedural technicalities during a Chandigarh legal conference.
Zenito Cardozo, convicted in the brutal 2009 Goa gang war case, has moved the Supreme Court challenging his life sentence. Get exclusive details on the legal battle that has shocked the coastal state.
Supreme Court delivers stern rebuke to governments for failing to implement crucial transgender welfare schemes. Landmark verdict highlights systematic neglect of fundamental rights.