Court: Religious slogans alone don't prove rioting
A Delhi court acquits three men in 2020 riots case, stating mere chanting of religious slogans doesn't establish unlawful assembly. Significant legal precedent set.
A Delhi court acquits three men in 2020 riots case, stating mere chanting of religious slogans doesn't establish unlawful assembly. Significant legal precedent set.
Maharashtra's opposition parties accuse Election Commission of bias in civic poll scheduling amid voter list discrepancies. MVA coalition demands transparency ahead of crucial local elections.
In a significant legal victory, NCLAT sets aside key anti-competitive allegations against WhatsApp, allowing the messaging giant to continue its operations without restrictions in India.
In a landmark ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court reinstated a man who cleared all police selection stages but was denied employment. Discover how the court delivered justice after a seven-year legal battle.
In a landmark judgment, Kerala High Court rules that first wife must be heard before registering second marriage under Muslim personal law, strengthening women's rights.
In a landmark ruling, India's NCLAT dismisses WhatsApp's appeal against CCI's antitrust investigation into its 2021 privacy policy, dealing a significant blow to Meta's data-sharing practices in its largest market.
Allahabad High Court reinforces government mandate requiring specific educational qualifications for assistant teacher appointments, dismissing petitions challenging the rule. Landmark decision impacts teaching recruitment across Uttar Pradesh.
Despite ongoing internal conflicts, Maharashtra's ruling Mahayuti alliance announces coordinated strategy for upcoming elections. Key leaders from BJP, Shiv Sena, and NCP plan joint campaigns to present united front.
Delhi's air quality deteriorates sharply as stagnant winds create pollution trap. AQI reaches 'very poor' category with major pollutants PM2.5 and PM10 dominating the atmosphere. Health advisory issued for vulnerable groups.
Punjab & Haryana High Court delivers landmark judgment affirming that convictions stand if evidence is solid, even with procedural flaws in confession recording. Key ruling for Indian military justice system.
Growing internal conflicts within Maharashtra's ruling Mahayuti alliance surface ahead of crucial local body elections, exposing coordination challenges between BJP, Shiv Sena, and NCP factions.
In a groundbreaking judgment, Punjab & Haryana High Court declares international travel a fundamental necessity, ordering passport release for better employment opportunities abroad.
Delhi government introduces revolutionary Pink Saheli Smart Card offering free bus travel to women and transgender individuals across all DTC buses, enhancing mobility and empowerment.
Supreme Court delivers crucial judgment protecting personal choice in marriage matters, clarifying that saying 'no' to marriage doesn't constitute abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC.
Delhi government introduces revolutionary pink smart cards offering free bus travel for women and transgender individuals on all DTC and cluster buses, enhancing urban mobility and safety.
A federal judge mandates immediate distribution of food assistance benefits to American families, delivering a legal blow to the Trump administration's delayed pandemic relief efforts.
As temperatures plummet in Delhi, government-run night shelters at Kashmiri Gate become crucial lifelines for homeless residents, offering warmth, meals, and dignity during harsh winter months.
The high-profile attack case involving Delhi CM Rekha Gupta has been escalated to Sessions Court. Get exclusive insights into the legal proceedings, charges framed, and what happens next in this politically significant case.
In a significant legal blow to Trump-era policies, federal judges have ruled that the former president cannot restrict SNAP food assistance benefits for low-income Americans. This landmark decision protects millions from hunger.
In a significant ruling, a federal court has ordered the Trump administration to maintain food stamp benefits despite the ongoing government shutdown, ensuring millions of Americans won't go hungry.
The Supreme Court clarifies that in-house legal advisors cannot invoke client-attorney privilege under Section 132 of the Evidence Act during income tax searches, marking a significant legal interpretation.
In a landmark ruling, a federal judge has permanently barred any future administration from reinstating Trump-era policy requiring citizenship documentation for voter registration, marking a significant victory for voting rights advocates.
Tensions escalate as Karkardooma lawyers' association prohibits police entry following alleged manhandling of an advocate, raising concerns about legal fraternity and law enforcement relations.
In a significant legal setback for the Trump administration, federal judges have ordered the continuation of food assistance benefits, safeguarding millions of Americans from potential hunger during government funding uncertainties.
Federal court halts Trump administration's attempt to enforce work requirements for food stamp recipients during pandemic, protecting vital nutrition benefits for vulnerable citizens.
In a significant Delhi riots case hearing, petitioners argue prosecution lacks concrete evidence connecting them to 2020 violence. Court examines claims of fabricated charges and missing evidence.
In a landmark judgment, Karnataka High Court clarifies that guarantors cannot be discharged from their obligations without full repayment or substitution by another surety. Learn how this ruling strengthens financial accountability.
In a significant judgment, Karnataka High Court rules disciplinary authorities cannot conduct endless fresh inquiries against employees, setting crucial legal precedent for government service matters.
In a significant legal development, the Madras High Court has dismissed an IPS officer's petition seeking to quash the defamation case filed by cricket legend MS Dhoni. Get exclusive details on the court's ruling and what happens next in this high-profile
Delhi High Court imposes heavy costs on a litigant who attempted to mislead the court by misrepresenting himself, marking a strong stance against abuse of legal process.