India has formally requested the United States to reconsider its proposal to impose a 12.5 percent tariff on Indian goods, rejecting allegations that it has failed to prohibit the import of products made with forced labour. New Delhi has also offered to engage in dialogue with the US Trade Representative (USTR) to address any specific concerns.
India's Response to USTR Investigation
In its response to the USTR's Section 301 investigation report, India argued that the agency had failed to identify or substantiate any specific act, policy or practice that would qualify as 'unreasonable' under the law either for India or any other country under review. The USTR had launched two separate Section 301 investigations on March 11 and 12, 2026, examining 60 economies over concerns linked to forced labour and excess industrial capacity.
Proposed Tariff Details
On June 3, the USTR released its findings on the forced labour probe, proposing fresh tariffs on 54 economies. Under the plan, India, China and 46 other economies would be subject to a steeper 12.5 percent duty, while Canada, Ecuador, the European Union, Indonesia, Mexico and Pakistan would face a 10 percent tariff. The proposal has not yet been finalised.
In its submission to the USTR on July 6, India stated: 'In view of the claims advanced, the identified gaps and lack of a sufficient basis, India requests the United States to reconsider the proposed imposition of tariffs against India. India remains willing to engage constructively with the USTR through consultation and dialogue on any specific concern.'
Evidentiary Threshold Not Met
New Delhi further argued that the USTR had not met the evidentiary threshold required to show how the absence of forced labour import bans in these countries meaningfully distorts market conditions or harms compliant firms. 'A mere absence of a forced labour import prohibition cannot be construed as 'unreasonable' within the meaning of Section 301 of the Act,' India stated.
It also accused the USTR of issuing a blanket determination against all 60 economies without conducting country-specific assessments of their laws and enforcement practices. 'In relation to India, there is inadequate and insufficient evidence that the lack of forced labour import ban causes an alleged unfair comparative advantage to the detriment of the US industry. Evidence across sectors of major exports of India to the US does not suggest any linkage with forced labour inputs,' the submission added.
