Lenskart Controversy Escalates with Personal and Policy Dimensions
The online discourse surrounding Lenskart has significantly amplified, evolving from a debate over a company document into a multifaceted issue that now incorporates personal elements. Social media platforms are inundated with reactions, and the conversation has transcended mere workplace regulations to include a personal angle involving Lenskart CEO Peyush Bansal and his wife, Nidhi Mittal. This situation has morphed into a complex blend of policy concerns and revived online content, both being vigorously discussed concurrently.
Nidhi Mittal's Resurfaced Posts Spark Widespread Attention
Nidhi Mittal has become a focal point after her old social media posts from 2013 to 2015 began recirculating extensively on platform X. These posts, which have been widely shared, reportedly show her expressing support for the Aam Aadmi Party during that era, along with views critical of certain other political groups and organizations. The screenshots include hashtags related to election campaigns and public discourse from that period, as well as references to specific organizations.
As these posts gained traction, her social media account became inaccessible, suggesting it may have been deactivated in response to the backlash, as noted in a report by Business Today. Despite this, the screenshots continue to propagate online, fueling ongoing discussions and debates across digital platforms.
Details of the Lenskart Internal Document Controversy
Simultaneously, Lenskart is facing substantial criticism over an internal document titled "Staff Uniform and Grooming Guide," dated February 2, 2026, which was leaked online. This document has raised significant concerns due to its handling of religious symbols in the workplace.
According to the leaked content, the document imposed restrictions on items such as bindis, sacred threads like kalava, and religious wristbands. It permitted hijabs and turbans but under conditions, including a mandatory black color requirement. Additionally, it advised that sindoor should be applied "subtly." These stipulations have ignited criticism and sparked a broader debate about religious inclusivity and corporate policies.
Peyush Bansal's Response and Clarifications
Initially, when the document surfaced, Peyush Bansal dismissed it as "inaccurate." However, a Community Note on X highlighted that the document appeared recent and bore official branding. Subsequently, Bansal acknowledged that the document was genuine but described it as an "outdated internal training document." He clarified that it was not an active HR policy and admitted that restrictions on items like bindi and tilak "should never have been written." He further stated that these provisions had been removed internally as of February 17, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is based on viral social media posts, screenshots, and media reports. Efforts are ongoing to independently verify the authenticity and context of the information. Currently, it reflects the content being shared and discussed online and does not necessarily represent the views of the publication.
