Mangalore University Honorary Doctorate Selection Sparks Procedure Controversy
As Mangalore University (MU) prepares for its 44th Annual Convocation, the process of selecting recipients for honorary doctorates (honoris causa) has come under renewed scrutiny, with syndicate members alleging that statutory procedure was bypassed in a significant departure from established norms.
Allegations of Procedure Bypass
MU forwarded 14 names to the governor of Karnataka, who serves as chancellor of the university, for consideration for honorary doctorates. Syndicate members confirmed that the move followed directives from the chancellor's office, but argued vehemently that it deviated from the procedure laid down in the university statutes and the Karnataka University Act, 2000.
A syndicate member alleged that the body was not allowed to exercise its proper role in screening and shortlisting candidates. "In the recent meeting, we were directed to forward all 14 names to the governor. As per the rule book, the syndicate scrutinises applications and recommends three names to the governor for consideration," the member stated, highlighting what they see as a fundamental procedural violation.
Historical Context and Eligibility Concerns
The issue has gained particular prominence as MU has faced criticism in recent years for conferring honorary doctorates on affluent businessmen rather than individuals recognised for exceptional contributions in various fields. Critics have consistently cited Section 69 of the Karnataka University Act, 2000, which clearly lays down eligibility criteria and limits honorary degrees to persons with distinguished contributions in specified fields.
Vice-chancellor PL Dharma had earlier maintained that the university would ensure transparency in the selection process and strictly adhere to statutory provisions. However, current developments appear to contradict these assurances according to syndicate members.
Syndicate's Recorded Objections
According to detailed accounts from syndicate members, all 14 proposals were placed before the syndicate at a recent meeting. While the syndicate resolved to forward the names in compliance with the directive received, it also formally recorded that the standard procedure requires the syndicate to scrutinise applications and formally recommend three achievers from different fields.
Another member revealed that the list included businessmen, scientists and other personalities, but alleged there was no detailed discussion on merit-based selection. The member added that the syndicate had suggested the name of Padma Shri awardee Harekala Hajabba, known for his significant contributions to education and social service, but the proposal was not taken up for consideration.
Broader Implications and Concerns
"It is disheartening that the syndicate and the vice-chancellor had no effective say in the selection, despite having the authority," a member expressed, warning that any controversial choice could embarrass the university and undermine the prestige of the honorary doctorate system.
MU had received 11 applications for honorary doctorates during the last convocation, making the current increase to 14 names particularly noteworthy. VC PL Dharma was unavailable for comment when approached regarding these latest developments.
The controversy raises fundamental questions about governance, transparency, and adherence to statutory frameworks in higher education institutions, with potential implications for how honorary degrees are awarded across the university system in Karnataka.
