A recent controversy has erupted online after a man from Gurugram made distasteful comments suggesting that a Rs 370 biryani gave him unrestricted access to a woman's body. The remarks have sparked widespread outrage, with many condemning the objectification and entitlement displayed. Comedian Pranit More, who was allegedly involved in the incident, has seemingly deactivated his Instagram account amidst the backlash.
The Incident
The controversy began when a screenshot of a conversation went viral, showing a man claiming that because he had paid Rs 370 for a biryani, he was entitled to a woman's consent. The comment was widely criticized as sexist and degrading, highlighting a disturbing mindset that equates monetary transactions with bodily autonomy.
Pranit More's Involvement
Comedian Pranit More was named in connection with the controversy, though the exact nature of his involvement remains unclear. Following the uproar, More deactivated his Instagram account, leading to speculation that he was trying to avoid further scrutiny. Neither More nor his representatives have issued an official statement regarding the matter.
Zomato Denies Notification
Food delivery platform Zomato was also dragged into the controversy after a fake notification claiming 'biryani bhejdu' (I'll send biryani) was circulated online. Zomato quickly denied any involvement, tweeting, 'An important clarification,' along with a statement that the notification was not from them. The company urged users to verify information before sharing.
Social Media Reaction
The internet has been ablaze with reactions, with many users expressing anger and disappointment. Hashtags like #ConsentMatters and #RespectWomen trended as people called for accountability. Some users defended More, arguing that the controversy was blown out of proportion, but the majority condemned the remarks as unacceptable.
Broader Implications
This incident has reignited conversations about consent, entitlement, and the objectification of women in Indian society. Activists and netizens alike have emphasized that no material exchange can ever justify violating someone's autonomy. The controversy also highlights the power of social media in holding individuals accountable for their actions.
