In a significant intervention, seasoned former diplomat KP Fabian has counseled the Indian government to steadfastly rely on diplomatic channels to navigate its complex relationship with Bangladesh. He explicitly warned against any consideration of military action, framing such an approach as counterproductive and damaging to long-term interests.
A Veteran's Caution Against Hard Power
Fabian, who served as India's ambassador to Finland and several other nations, articulated his views during an interview. He stressed that the use of force is never a viable solution between neighboring countries, especially ones with deep historical and cultural bonds like India and Bangladesh. His advice comes amid ongoing discussions in strategic circles about regional security dynamics.
The former envoy pointed to the profound and multifaceted connections between the two nations. He reminded audiences of India's crucial role in Bangladesh's liberation war of 1971, a foundational event that created an enduring legacy. This shared history, he argued, forms a bedrock upon which contemporary issues should be resolved.
The Imperative of Dialogue and Mutual Respect
Fabian emphasized that diplomacy must be rooted in open and respectful dialogue. He suggested that India should engage proactively with the current government in Dhaka led by Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, while also maintaining communication channels with all significant political entities within Bangladesh. This inclusive approach, he believes, is essential for sustainable and stable relations.
The core of his argument is that stability in Bangladesh is intrinsically linked to stability in India's northeastern region. A cooperative and peaceful Bangladesh acts as a vital partner for India's economic and security objectives in the East. Conversely, any instability or hostility would have immediate and adverse repercussions for Indian states sharing the border.
Broader Regional Stability at Stake
Fabian's commentary extends beyond the bilateral frame, touching on larger geopolitical undercurrents. He implicitly addressed concerns about external influences in the region, advocating for a robust and principled Indian diplomatic stance that safeguards its interests without resorting to aggression. His perspective underscores that India's strength as a regional leader is demonstrated through patient statecraft and confidence in its diplomatic corps, not through coercive measures.
The former diplomat's remarks serve as a timely reminder of the tools available in statecraft. In an era where complex challenges dominate foreign policy, Fabian champions a return to the fundamental principles of negotiation, understanding, and strategic patience as the most reliable path forward for India in managing its vital partnership with Bangladesh.
