The Election Commission of India has informed the Supreme Court that nearly 99% of enumeration forms for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR 2.0) exercise have already been distributed across Kerala, indicating significant progress in the voter enrollment drive.
Legal Proceedings and EC's Stance
During a crucial hearing before the Supreme Court, senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the Election Commission, presented a strong defense of the ongoing revision process. Dwivedi contended that there was no valid reason to defer the Special Intensive Revision in Kerala despite the upcoming local body election process.
The legal representative emphasized that both the national Election Commission and the Kerala State Election Commission are working in close collaboration to ensure the smooth completion of the voter enrollment exercise. This coordination between election authorities aims to prevent any conflict between the SIR 2.0 process and the local body elections.
Progress Amidst Challenges
The revelation about the near-complete distribution of enumeration forms demonstrates the Election Commission's commitment to advancing the voter revision process without unnecessary delays. The 99% distribution rate, reported as of November 26, 2025, shows substantial ground coverage despite concerns about timing with local elections.
The Special Intensive Revision represents a crucial effort to update and verify voter lists, ensuring that all eligible citizens have the opportunity to participate in the democratic process. The high percentage of forms distributed indicates that the initial phase of the exercise has been largely successful in reaching households across Kerala.
Coordinated Election Management
The Election Commission's argument before the Supreme Court highlighted the effective collaboration between national and state election bodies. This cooperative approach ensures that both the SIR 2.0 and local body elections can proceed simultaneously without compromising the integrity of either process.
Legal experts suggest that the Commission's position reflects confidence in their operational capabilities and logistical planning. The assurance given to the Supreme Court indicates that adequate measures are in place to manage both electoral exercises efficiently, minimizing potential confusion among voters and administrative staff.
As the Special Intensive Revision continues, election authorities remain focused on completing the enrollment verification process while preparing for the local body elections. The Supreme Court's consideration of this matter will determine whether the current timeline stands or requires adjustment based on the presented arguments.
