Over 5,500 Arrested Under UAPA in Five Years, Just 5% Convicted
Recent government data shows a stark picture of India's anti-terrorism law enforcement. From 2018 to 2022, authorities made more than 5,500 arrests under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. However, only about 5% of these cases resulted in convictions. This low conviction rate highlights significant challenges in the legal process.
Arrest Numbers and Conviction Disparity
The figures come from official records presented in Parliament. They indicate a high volume of arrests under the UAPA, a law designed to combat terrorism and unlawful activities. Yet, the conviction rate remains minimal. Experts point to this gap as evidence of potential misuse or weak evidence in many cases.
Activists and legal scholars express deep concern over these statistics. They argue that the law often leads to prolonged detentions without trial. Many individuals spend years in jail before their cases reach a conclusion. This situation raises questions about justice and human rights.
Impact on Legal System and Society
The UAPA allows for extended pre-trial detention and makes bail difficult to obtain. Critics say this creates a system where accusations can ruin lives even without proof. Families of those arrested face social stigma and financial hardship. The low conviction rate suggests many arrests might not hold up in court.
Government officials defend the law as necessary for national security. They claim it helps prevent terrorist acts and maintains public order. However, the data prompts calls for review and reform. Balancing security needs with civil liberties remains a contentious issue.
Key Points from the Data:- Over 5,500 arrests under UAPA from 2018 to 2022.
- Conviction rate stands at approximately 5%.
- Concerns about misuse and prolonged detentions without trial.
- Calls for legal reforms to ensure fairness and justice.
This report underscores the need for a closer look at how anti-terrorism laws operate in practice. Ensuring they protect citizens without infringing on rights is crucial for a democratic society.
