Andhra Pradesh High Court Takes Charge of SIT Investigation into Group-1 Exam Irregularities
In a significant development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court declared on Friday that it will actively monitor the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into alleged irregularities in the evaluation of Group-1 answer sheets. The court emphasized its expectation for a transparent and sincere investigation into the matter, underscoring judicial oversight in this high-stakes case.
Background of the Case and Court Directives
The controversy stems from the 2018 Group-1 examination, where suspicions of evaluation malpractices prompted legal action. Earlier, the High Court had directed the state government to constitute an SIT, specifying that the team be led by an officer not below the rank of Additional Director General of Police (ADGP). The court also ordered the transfer of successful candidates who had joined service to non-focal positions as part of the investigation process.
In response, the government formed an SIT headed by Ravishankar Ayyannar. However, compliance with the transfer orders was delayed, leading the High Court to reprimand the chief secretary for failing to adhere to judicial directives. The court granted an additional day to execute the transfers, after which the state government transferred 86 officers, as confirmed by Special Government Pleader S Pranati in a recent hearing.
Judicial Monitoring and Ongoing Proceedings
A bench comprising Justice Battu Devanand and Justice Hari Haranatha Sharma stated that they would closely monitor the SIT investigation to ensure it reaches a logical conclusion. The court's decision to oversee the probe highlights its commitment to accountability and justice in this sensitive issue affecting public service appointments.
Meanwhile, the High Court has issued notices to Chief Secretary K Vijayanand and Principal Secretary in the General Administration Department (GAD), Shyamala Rao, in a contempt petition filed against them for alleged non-implementation of court orders. The petition was moved by Gorla Sujatha, one of the petitioners in the batch, citing failure to comply with orders issued on February 11. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on March 16, indicating continued judicial scrutiny.
Key Implications and Future Outlook
This case underscores the judiciary's proactive role in ensuring integrity in competitive examinations and government processes. The court's monitoring of the SIT probe aims to:
- Guarantee a fair and unbiased investigation into the alleged irregularities.
- Enforce compliance with judicial orders to maintain the rule of law.
- Address public concerns over transparency in recruitment for key government positions.
As the investigation progresses under court supervision, stakeholders await outcomes that could impact the careers of involved officers and set precedents for handling similar cases in the future. The High Court's involvement signals a robust approach to upholding ethical standards in public administration.
