Bombay High Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against Fashion Designer Riyaz Ganji in Contempt Petition
The Bombay High Court has taken a stern stance by issuing a non-bailable warrant (NBW) against fashion designer Riyaz Ganji, the managing director of the fashion brand Libas Designs Ltd. This action comes in response to a contempt petition filed over alleged non-disclosure of assets and unpaid contractual dues, with the court explicitly stating that Ganji deserves "no sympathy or mercy" for his conduct.
Court Criticizes Disregard for Judicial Process
Justice Abhay Ahuja expressed serious concern over Ganji's absence from court proceedings, despite being directed to remain present. The court has ordered the police to ensure Ganji's appearance on the next hearing date, scheduled for April 27. In its observations, the court highlighted that Ganji's actions demonstrate a clear disregard for the judicial process, undermining the authority of the legal system.
Background of the Dispute
The case originated from a plea filed by G S Majestic Developers Pvt Ltd against Libas Designs Ltd and other parties. The dispute centers on Libas's franchisee store in a mall located in Ludhiana, Punjab, where the brand allegedly exited the premises without settling contractual dues. The court noted that the details provided about the brand's stores were vague, mentioning only general locations such as Mumbai's Kurla and Pedder Road, as well as Ludhiana, without exact addresses. This lack of specificity has complicated efforts to proceed with asset attachment.
Court Orders and Restrictions
In addition to issuing the non-bailable warrant, the Bombay High Court has imposed strict restrictions on Ganji and his company. The court has restrained Ganji, Libas Designs Ltd, and its directors from dealing with or disposing of any assets, whether movable or immovable, until further orders. This measure aims to prevent any potential dissipation of assets that could affect the resolution of the case.
The order, dated April 2, was made available to the public on Monday, underscoring the court's commitment to transparency and accountability in legal proceedings. The case continues to highlight the importance of compliance with court directives and the consequences of failing to adhere to judicial processes.
