A Delhi court conducted a hearing on Saturday regarding the framing of charges against former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. The hearing focused on the Delhi excise policy case. Kejriwal's legal team presented their arguments strongly.
Defence Challenges CBI Chargesheet
Senior advocate N Hariharan represented Arvind Kejriwal in court. He argued forcefully that the Central Bureau of Investigation's chargesheet lacks new evidence. Hariharan described the document as a cut-and-paste version of earlier chargesheets. He emphasized that no fresh material links Kejriwal to any alleged offence.
Key Points from the Defence
The defence made several important assertions during the hearing:
- Kejriwal was performing his official duties as Chief Minister at all relevant times.
- There is no proof that Kejriwal asked anyone to accept money from the so-called South Liquor Lobby.
- Kejriwal's name appeared only in the fourth supplementary chargesheet, not in earlier documents.
- The latest chargesheet merely repackages old material without adding substance.
Prosecution's Allegations
According to the prosecution, the alleged South Liquor Lobby paid kickbacks totaling Rs 100 crore. They claim this money went to the Aam Aadmi Party for its Goa election campaign. The prosecution says one arrested businessman facilitated these payments.
Judicial Proceedings
Special CBI judge Jitendra Singh presided over the hearing. The judge carefully noted all submissions from both sides. After hearing the arguments, Judge Singh adjourned the matter. The next hearing is scheduled for February 7.
Hariharan also raised questions about the investigation process. He argued that any further probe requires proper court approval. The defence maintains that additional evidence must clearly establish guilt before proceeding.
The case continues to draw significant public attention. Legal experts are watching the proceedings closely. The court's decision on framing charges will be crucial for all parties involved.
