The Delhi High Court on Thursday initiated contempt of court proceedings against former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for his alleged remarks targeting the judiciary. The court took suo motu cognizance of statements made by Kejriwal, which it described as part of a systematic vilification campaign aimed at undermining public confidence in the judicial system.
Court's Observations
A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela observed that Kejriwal's comments appeared to be a deliberate attempt to scandalize the judiciary and interfere with the administration of justice. The bench noted that such remarks could erode faith in the institution and were not protected under the right to free speech.
Kejriwal's Statements Under Scrutiny
The court specifically referred to Kejriwal's recent social media posts and public speeches where he alleged bias and misconduct by certain judges. The High Court said these statements were prima facie contemptuous as they went beyond fair criticism and amounted to personal attacks.
Senior advocate representing Kejriwal argued that his client's comments were based on genuine concerns about judicial transparency. However, the court rejected this submission, stating that the language used was intemperate and designed to create a narrative of institutional failure.
Previous Warnings
This is not the first time Kejriwal has faced judicial ire. In 2024, the Supreme Court had cautioned him against making unsubstantiated allegations against the judiciary. The Delhi High Court noted that despite earlier warnings, Kejriwal continued to engage in what it termed a 'malicious campaign'.
Legal Implications
The contempt notice requires Kejriwal to file a personal response within two weeks explaining why he should not be punished for contempt. If found guilty, he could face a fine or imprisonment up to six months under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Legal experts say this case highlights the tension between freedom of speech and the need to protect judicial independence. The court emphasized that while criticism of judicial decisions is permissible, personal attacks on judges are not.
Political Reactions
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) termed the contempt action as an attack on democratic dissent. Party spokesperson said Kejriwal has always stood for judicial accountability and his remarks were twisted by the court. Meanwhile, the ruling BJP welcomed the move, accusing Kejriwal of consistently disrespecting constitutional institutions.
The case is likely to be heard next in July 2026. Meanwhile, Kejriwal has been directed to refrain from making any further statements on the matter until the proceedings conclude.
