ED Seeks Adjournment in I-PAC Raid Case as TMC Demands Data Protection
ED Seeks Adjournment in I-PAC Raid Case, TMC Wants Data Safe

ED Requests Adjournment in I-PAC Raids Case as TMC Seeks Data Protection

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has formally requested an adjournment in the ongoing case related to its raids on I-PAC. This development unfolded before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday. Simultaneously, the Trinamool Congress (TMC) has moved the court seeking urgent protection of sensitive data.

ED's Legal Argument for Adjournment

The counsel representing the Enforcement Directorate presented a clear legal stance. They argued that the Calcutta High Court should not proceed with hearing this matter. The reason cited is straightforward. A related case is currently pending before the Supreme Court of India.

The ED's position is firm. When a matter is already under consideration by the apex court, a high court should refrain from hearing it. This legal principle aims to prevent conflicting judgments and ensure judicial hierarchy is respected.

TMC's Counter-Move for Data Security

While the ED pushed for a delay, the Trinamool Congress presented its own urgent plea. The political party is deeply concerned about the data seized during the raids on Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC) offices.

TMC lawyers emphasized the need for immediate safeguards. They requested the Calcutta High Court to issue orders protecting this data from any potential misuse or unauthorized access. The party argues that the information is highly sensitive and could impact political strategies and individual privacy.

The Broader Context of the Case

This legal tussle stems from recent raids conducted by the Enforcement Directorate on I-PAC. The agency is investigating alleged financial irregularities. I-PAC is a well-known political consultancy that has worked with various parties, including TMC.

The situation has created a significant political and legal flashpoint. Key points of contention include:

  • The legal jurisdiction of different courts.
  • The handling of seized digital evidence.
  • The intersection of investigation protocols and data privacy rights.

All parties now await further directions from the Calcutta High Court. The judge must balance the ED's request for an adjournment against TMC's plea for urgent data protection. This case highlights the complex interplay between law enforcement actions and legal safeguards in politically sensitive investigations.