Punjab and Haryana High Court Condemns 'Institutional Exploitation' of Long-Serving Sweeper
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has raised serious concerns about the treatment of a part-time sweeper employed by the Haryana government since 1986. In a recent hearing, the court described the failure to regularize his position after nearly four decades as "institutional exploitation." This strong language highlights the court's view that the situation violates basic principles of fairness and social justice.
Court's Observations on the Case
Justice Sandeep Moudgil presided over a writ petition filed by Bir Singh, also known as Bhira. The petitioner has worked continuously as a part-time sweeper for almost 40 years. The court noted that his duties are essential and ongoing, not occasional or temporary. His service record shows no issues, making the denial of regularization even more troubling.
The court emphasized that this long-term denial goes against constitutional rights, specifically Articles 14, 16, and 19. These articles protect equality, employment opportunities, and freedoms. Justice Moudgil stated that the state, as a model employer, should not benefit from decades of labor without taking responsibility. He called this a departure from India's vision of a humane and socialist society.
Legal Arguments and Next Steps
Advocate Deepak Sonak represented Bir Singh in court. He argued that the sweeper has spent his prime years serving the state with dedication and integrity. On the other side, Additional Advocate General Deepak Balyan appeared for the Haryana government. He assured the court that the case would be reviewed positively, considering the court's comments and previous legal decisions.
The court has directed the state to file a reply at least one week before the next hearing. An advance copy must go to the petitioner's counsel. The matter is adjourned to January 31 for further proceedings. This case puts a spotlight on labor rights and government accountability in Haryana.
