The Karnataka High Court has ruled that the Right to Information (RTI) Act cannot be used as a tool to obtain personal information solely for advancing a private claim. Justice Suraj Govindaraj made this observation while dismissing a petition filed by Bengaluru resident S Savithramma.
Background of the Case
Savithramma had approached the Karnataka Information Commission (KIC) seeking details of the assets and liabilities of SP Jayapal, who served as deputy controller at the central KSRTC office between 1990 and 2002. She alleged that Jayapal fraudulently obtained a sale deed from her and required the documents for pending civil suits.
KIC Rejection
On May 6, 2025, the KIC rejected her application, stating that the information sought fell under personal information and was exempted under the RTI Act. Savithramma then challenged this order before the High Court, arguing that Jayapal, being a public servant, should disclose his immovable property and corresponding assets and liabilities.
Court's Ruling
Justice Govindaraj rejected this argument, emphasizing the constitutional protection of the right to privacy. He noted that Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act represents a statutory manifestation of this protection. The judge stated that before directing disclosure of personal information, the authority must be satisfied that public interest outweighs the privacy interests of the individual. No such circumstances were demonstrated in this case.
The judge further remarked, "Mere allegations, however serious, cannot by themselves convert personal information into public information."
Key Takeaways
- The RTI Act cannot be used for personal claims.
- Personal information is protected under the right to privacy.
- Public interest must outweigh privacy concerns for disclosure.
Stay updated with the latest Bengaluru news.
