In a significant legal development, the Dharwad Bench of the Karnataka High Court has intervened to reinstate the president of the Belagavi Bar Association, setting aside a contentious no-confidence motion and subsequent election. This ruling allows advocate SS Kivadasannavar to continue in his official capacity, bringing a months-long internal dispute to a decisive close.
Court's Verdict Overturns Association Election
The court's order, delivered on December 15, 2025, effectively quashed the entire process that led to the election of new office-bearers on September 20. Justice Nagprasanna, presiding over the writ petition, found that the procedures followed to remove the president were not conducted in accordance with the established rules of the association. The judgment sets a clear precedent, emphasizing that any no-confidence motion moved in violation of the law stands invalid.
Speaking to the media after the verdict, SS Kivadasannavar expressed his relief and commitment. He stated that the activities of the Bar Association are firmly conducted within the legal framework, leaving no room for an improperly conducted vote of no confidence. He described the court's decision as a historic judgment that has granted him another opportunity to serve the advocates of Belagavi.
President Vows to Move Forward and Unite Members
In his remarks, Kivadasannavar indicated a forward-looking approach, choosing to treat the tumultuous events of the past few months as a "bad dream." He pledged to work inclusively, taking into confidence all senior faculty members and esteemed colleagues of the association. A key focus, he announced, would be to humbly endeavor and prepare for the celebration of the association's 150th anniversary, a major milestone.
The president also extended his gratitude to the legal team that supported his case. He specifically thanked senior advocates VM Sheelvant and AL Neelopant from the High Court Bench in Dharwad, as well as fellow colleagues Dhanraj R Gavali, Vijay N Honmani, Prashant Wadeyar, and Subhash Pattanshetti for their concern and support throughout the legal proceedings.
Implications for Legal Bodies and Internal Governance
This ruling underscores the critical importance of strict adherence to procedural bylaws within professional associations, especially legal bodies. The Karnataka High Court's decision reinforces that internal governance mechanisms must be followed meticulously, and any deviation can render actions such as no-confidence motions legally untenable. The verdict not only resolves the leadership question at the Belagavi Bar Association but also serves as a guiding principle for similar organizations across the state.
