The Maharashtra government has taken a firm stand against granting parole to convicted gangster Abu Salem. Officials have formally opposed his application in court. They cited significant concerns about his potential to flee the country.
Key Reasons for Opposition
Authorities presented two primary arguments to block Salem's release. First, they highlighted a serious flight risk. Salem has a history of international connections. He could attempt to escape to avoid serving his full sentence.
Diplomatic Implications with Portugal
The second major concern involves diplomatic relations. Salem was extradited from Portugal to India in 2005. His extradition came with specific conditions. Granting him parole might violate those terms.
This could lead to a diplomatic fallout between India and Portugal. It might also complicate future extradition cases. The government wants to avoid setting a problematic precedent.
Security and Legal Risks
Beyond diplomacy, officials worry about security. Salem was convicted for his role in the 1993 Mumbai blasts. He faces multiple life sentences. Releasing him, even temporarily, poses a threat to public safety.
The court is now reviewing the government's submission. A decision on the parole plea is expected soon. This case underscores the balance between prisoner rights and national security.
Legal experts note that parole decisions often weigh rehabilitation against risk. Here, the state argues the risks are too high. They emphasize Salem's notoriety and the gravity of his crimes.
The Maharashtra government's move reflects a cautious approach. It aims to uphold justice while safeguarding international agreements. The outcome could influence similar high-profile cases in the future.
