The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that a 24-hour police security detail cannot be provided to an interfaith couple unless there is clear and convincing evidence of a genuine threat to their lives. The court made this observation while dismissing a writ petition filed by a woman and her husband, residents of Ratlam city, on May 14.
Court's Ruling on Security Demands
The bench emphasized that police protection is a serious measure that cannot be granted based on mere apprehension or assumption. The court stated that there must be concrete proof of a threat, such as specific threats from identifiable individuals or groups, before such extensive security can be justified. The couple had sought round-the-clock protection, claiming they faced harassment and danger due to their interfaith marriage.
Background of the Case
The petitioners, who married against the wishes of their families, argued that they had received threats and were living in fear. However, the court found that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant continuous police presence. The judgment noted that while the state has a duty to protect all citizens, it must balance resources and avoid unnecessary deployment of personnel.
This ruling sets a precedent for similar cases where interfaith couples seek police protection. Legal experts say it underscores the need for credible threat assessments before demanding state resources. The couple may still approach local police for assistance on a case-by-case basis if new threats emerge.
