Supreme Court Questions State Motives, Extends Protection to Former Intelligence Chief
The Supreme Court of India extended interim protection from arrest for T Prabhakar Rao on Friday. Rao served as the former chief of the Telangana Special Intelligence Bureau. This decision came during a hearing on the high-profile illegal phone tapping case.
Court Observes State's Intent to 'Break Down' the Accused
A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice R Mahadevan made a significant observation. The justices noted that it appeared the state government wanted Rao imprisoned to ensure he breaks down. The bench expressed clear disapproval of this approach.
The court stated it had already exercised its jurisdiction properly. Police custody was granted twice in the interest of the investigation. Rao cooperated fully with the probe during this period. The bench emphasized that the purpose of custody had been served completely.
Strong Words from the Bench
The Supreme Court bench delivered a firm message to the state counsel. "Now, if you are using this case for anything beyond what it is meant for we are the last persons to entertain," the justices declared. This statement highlighted the court's stance against potential misuse of legal proceedings.
The court extended Rao's interim protection until the next hearing date. The matter is now scheduled for March 10. The bench was hearing Rao's anticipatory bail plea alongside the state's petition opposing bail.
Background of the Case
The Supreme Court had previously granted Rao protection from arrest. He was directed to surrender before the special investigation team. This team is probing the illegal phone tapping case registered against Rao and five others in early 2025.
Rao completed two weeks of police custody following his surrender. He was released on December 26, 2025. The other five accused individuals, including four police officers, have already obtained bail and are currently out of custody.
State's Arguments and Court's Response
During Friday's hearing, the state questioned the maintainability of Rao's anticipatory bail plea. The bench reiterated its previous position. Custody had been granted specifically for investigation purposes, and that purpose was fulfilled.
The bench suggested making the protection absolute and closing the bail petition. Investigators retain the right to summon Rao for further interrogation whenever necessary. Rao must continue cooperating with the investigation as required.
Legal Questions Raised by the State
The state government urged the court to examine three important legal questions. These questions could have wider implications for similar cases in the future. The state counsel clarified that Rao was not being targeted personally.
The legal issues presented for examination include:
- Whether a person residing overseas can legitimately seek anticipatory bail
- Whether anticipatory bail remains maintainable when the accused has been declared an absconder and proceedings under the CrPC have been initiated
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted after an accused has already been taken into custody
Court's Decision on Legal Issues
The Supreme Court bench took note of these submissions. The justices decided that these legal issues could be examined separately from the current matter. The court chose to continue the interim protection until the next hearing on March 10.
This extension provides Rao continued protection from arrest while the legal questions are considered. The case continues to develop as both sides prepare their arguments for the March hearing.
